Study of the Relationship Between Hearing Loss and Cognitive Performance at Chronic Exposure to Noise


Hearing Loss
Cognitive Science
Occupational Exposure
Stroop Test

How to Cite

Alimohammadi , I. ., Ahmadi Kanrash , F. ., Vosoughi, S. . ., Abolaghasemi , J. ., Chalak , M. H. ., & Rahmani , K. . (2020). Study of the Relationship Between Hearing Loss and Cognitive Performance at Chronic Exposure to Noise. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 22(7). Retrieved from


Background: Noise is considered as one of the most significant and dangerous physical factors in work environments, and due to the advancement of industries, it has become a threat to physical and psychological health in the current era. In addition to its undesirable effects on the hearing system, noise can have harmful non-auditory effects that may cause physiological disorders and cognitive impairment.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hearing loss and workers’ cognitive performance in an indus- trial environment.

A total of 300 individuals were enrolled in this study after their informed consent was obtained, and their compliance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria was confirmed. Based on the sound intensity level, the individuals were classified into two groups of exposure to > 85 dB (n = 196) and 85 dB (n = 104). To measure the individuals’ occupational exposure at an 8-hour equivalent level based on the ISO 9612: 2009 standard, the Testo device (Model CEL-815) was used with the precision of 0.5 dB. The most common weighting that is used in noise measurement is A-weighting. Like the human ear, this effectively cuts off the lower and higher frequencies that the average person cannot hear. The DANPLEX-AS54 device was also used to check audiometry. To investigate the workers’ hearing performance, two psychological tests, namely Stroop and TOL, were used as well.

Results: Hearing loss was higher among workers exposed to a sound intensity level of > 85 dB than those exposed to a sound in- tensity level of 85 dB, and this difference was significant in all sound level frequencies (NIHL left ear: for 85 dB: 25.92 and for

Conclusions: The results of this study showed that noise-induced hearing loss in work environments had a significant positive relationship with cognitive indicators. In other words, an increase in the hearing loss level would result in changes in cognitive indicators such as number of errors and response time.> 85 dB: 27.49) (NIHL right ear: for 85 dB: 27.62 and for > 85 dB: 29.50) (P value < 0.05). The results showed a significant positive relationship between cognitive indicators and hearing loss (P value < 0.05). Moreover, the study of cognitive indicators in the two groups revealed that the mean change of cognitive performance indicators was higher among subjects exposed to a higher sound intensity level (P value < 0.05).



  1. Alimohammadi I, Ahmadi Kanrash F, Abolghasemi J, Afrazandeh H, Rahmani K. Effect of chronic noise exposure on aggressive behavior of automotive industry workers. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2018;9(4):170-5. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2018.1375. [PubMed: 30325357]. [PubMed Central: PMC6466992].
  2. Aluclu I, Dalgic A, Toprak ZF. A fuzzy logic-based model for noise control at industrial workplaces. Appl Ergon. 2008;39(3):368-78. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.005. [PubMed: 17959136].
  3. Andersson G, Khakpoor A, Lyttkens L. Masking of tinnitus and mental activity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27(4):270-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00581.x. [PubMed: 12169130].
  4. DeCaro R, Peelle JE, Grossman M, Wingfield A. The two sides of sensory-cognitive interactions: Effects of age, hearing acuity, and working memory span on sentence comprehension. Front Psychol. 2016;7:236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00236. [PubMed: 26973557]. [PubMed Central: PMC4770018].
  5. Divenyi PL, Stark PB, Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118(2):1089-100. doi: 10.1121/1.1953207. [PubMed: 16158663]. [PubMed Central: PMC1440523].
  6. Howarth A, Shone GR. Ageing and the auditory system. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(965):166-71. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.039388. [PubMed: 16517797]. [PubMed Central: PMC2563709].
  7. Jerger J, Chmiel R. Factor analytic structure of auditory impairment in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8(4):269-76. [PubMed: 9272749].
  8. Lee JH, Kang W, Yaang SR, Choy N, Lee CR. Cohort study for the effect of chronic noise exposure on blood pressure among male workers in Busan, Korea. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(6):509-17. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20692. [PubMed: 19267371].
  9. Kheirbek I, Ito K, Neitzel R, Kim J, Johnson S, Ross Z, et al. Spatial variation in environmental noise and air pollution in New York City. J Urban Health. 2014;91(3):415-31. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9857-0. [PubMed: 24488652]. [PubMed Central: PMC4074330].
  10. Lin FR. Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(10):1131-6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr115. [PubMed: 21768501]. [PubMed Central: PMC3172566].
  11. Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, An Y, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM. Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Neuropsychology. 2011;25(6):763-70. doi: 10.1037/a0024238. [PubMed: 21728425]. [PubMed Central: PMC3193888].
  12. Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(20):1851-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.506. [PubMed: 22083573]. [PubMed Central: PMC3564588].
  13. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(4):293-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868. [PubMed: 23337978]. [PubMed Central: PMC3869227].
  14. Maltby M. Occupational audiometry: Monitoring and protecting hearing at work. US: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.
  15. Mazelova J, Popelar J, Syka J. Auditory function in presbycusis: Peripheral vs. central changes. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38(1-2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00155-9. [PubMed: 12543265].
  16. Munzel T, Gori T, Babisch W, Basner M. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(13):829-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu030. [PubMed: 24616334]. [PubMed Central: PMC3971384].
  17. Jafari MJ, Khosrowabadi R, Khodakarim S, Mohammadian F. The effect of noise exposure on cognitive performance and brain activity patterns. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(17):2924-31. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.742. [PubMed: 31844459]. [PubMed Central: PMC6901841].
  18. Taljaard DS, Olaithe M, Brennan-Jones CG, Eikelboom RH, Bucks RS. The relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive function: A meta-analysis in adults. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(6):718-29. doi: 10.1111/coa.12607. [PubMed: 26670203].
  19. Ali Mohammadi I, Ahmadi kanrash F, Abolghasemi J, Rahmani K. The effects of chronical noise-exposure on hearing ability, psychological, and mental attitude of workers in automotive industry. J Tolooebehdasht. 2019. doi: 10.18502/tbj.v17i7.850.
  20. Naravane S. Effect of industrial noise on occupational skill performance capability. York: State University of New York at Binghamton; 2009.
  21. Peelle JE, Troiani V, Grossman M, Wingfield A. Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. J Neurosci. 2011;31(35):12638-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2559-11.2011. [PubMed: 21880924]. [PubMed Central: PMC3175595].
  22. Reed H. The psychosocial effects of hearing loss on adults. Ohio: The University of Akron; 2018.
  23. Salonen J, Johansson R, Joukamaa M. Alexithymia, depression and tinnitus in elderly people. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29(5):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.05.002. [PubMed: 17888810].
  24. Stach BA. Comprehensive dictionary of audiology: Illustrated. California: Plural Publishing; 2019.
  25. Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP. Noise pollution: Non-auditory effects on health. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:243-57. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg033. [PubMed: 14757721].
  26. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18(6):643-62. doi: 10.1037/h0054651.
  27. Tambs K. Moderate effects of hearing loss on mental health and subjective well-being: results from the Nord-Trondelag Hearing Loss Study. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(5):776-82. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000133328.03596.fb. [PubMed: 15385706].
  28. Choi AY, Shim HJ, Lee SH, Yoon SW, Joo EJ. Is cognitive function in adults with hearing impairment improved by the use of hearing AIDS? Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;4(2):72-6. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2011.4.2.72. [PubMed: 21716953]. [PubMed Central: PMC3109330].
  29. Alimohammadi I, Kanrash FA, Abolghasemi J, Vosoughi S, Rahmani K, Chalak MH. Relationship between noise annoyance and cognitive performance in automotive workers exposed to chronic noise. J UOEH. 2019;41(4):375-85. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.41.375. [PubMed: 31866655].
  30. Yuan J, Sun Y, Sang S, Pham JH, Kong WJ. The risk of cognitive impairment associated with hearing function in older adults: A pooled analysis of data from eleven studies. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2137. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20496-w. [PubMed: 29391476]. [PubMed Central: PMC5794920].
  31. Zheng Y, Fan S, Liao W, Fang W, Xiao S, Liu J. Hearing impairment and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(2):233-9. doi: