The Study of the Organizational Structure of Military Hospitals in Selected Countries of the World Based on the World Bank Model - a Qualitative Study


How to Cite

Nikoomanesh, M., Raeissi Dehkordi, P. ., Markazi Moghaddam, N. ., & Hashemi, S. M. (2023). The Study of the Organizational Structure of Military Hospitals in Selected Countries of the World Based on the World Bank Model - a Qualitative Study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 25(2).


Background: The double importance of health in military societies and its importance in the national security of countries has made maintaining, promoting and restoration of the military society’s health has become one of the fundamental concerns of countries.

Methods: The current comparative qualitative study based on Perker and Harding's model has investigated and compared the organizational structure of military hospitals in 9 countries: Germany, Brazil, Turkey, South Korea, South Africa, China, Pakistan, Italy and Iran by means of semi-structured interviews.
Results: The findings of the study showed that in 18 interviews, 61% of the participants were specialist and subspecialist doctors, and the work experience of 39% of the participants was between 25 and 30 years. The World Bank Model (Preker and Harding), for hospital structure, considers five dimensions: decision rights, market exposure, residual claims, accountability and social functions that in the dimension of the decision-making right, the findings indicate the focus of this dimension in the studied countries. Facing the goods and supplies market in a country like South Korea is left to the hospital; however, in South Africa, it is centrally conducted by the Health and Medical Commander. In countries like South Korea, Pakistan, China, and Iran, residual claimant is propelled through creating committees or supervisory boards, while hospitals have some authority on their residual claimant, and in other studied countries, the authority of all residual claimants are with the highest level of military health and treatment sector of the relevant country. In countries such as Germany, Italy, and South Korea, the accountability towards stakeholders has become decentralized. The dimension of social functions is not considered among the military hospitals’ duties; nevertheless, all the studied countries practically had a relatively active presence in the field of social functions and assistances.
Conclusion: Considering the importance of the health of the military community and the lack of available and published data and studies, it is necessary to enable mutual use of the experiences and learnings of this field by conducting studies of the military health system.


Rahmani R, Zareei Zavaraki E, Abbaspour A, Maleki H. Military medicine's role in the armed forces and the need to develop specialized education programs in Iran military medicine. J Mil Med. 2012;13(4):247-52.

Whitley J. Five actions to improve military hospital performance. Institute for Defense Analyses; 2017.

Statistical report of hospital statistics and information system. Ministry of Health; 2018.

Ameryoun A, Hamzeh Atani B, Mohebbi H. Assessment of medical equipment maintenance mamagement in two military hospitals. J Mil Med. 2011;9(3):189-95.

Lurie P. Comparing the costs of military treatment facilities with private sector care. IDA Paper NS: Institute for Defense Analyses; 2016.

Bricknell M, Cain P. Understanding the whole of military health systems. RUSI J. 2020; 165(3):40-9. doi:10.1080/03071847.2020.1784039

Zaboli R, Seyed H, Nejati Zarnaqi B, Khalilifar S. Functional analysis of hospital management in selected military hospitals using weisbord's "six-box model. Ebnesina J. 2013;15(13):31-40.

Nejati Zarnaqi B, Khalilifar O, Shahraki S. Examining the organizational structure of selected hospitals in Tehran and its relationship with hospital performance indicators. Ebnesina J. 2018;18(2):40-7.

Sadidi M, Amiri M, Khalilifar O, Moradi R. Technical efficiency evaluation of military hospitals in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Ebnesina J. 2019;21(1):35-48. doi:10.22034/21.1.35

Meamarzadeh G, Ahmadi M. Adaptive management Second, editor. Tehran: Andishehay e gohar bar; 2008.

Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-44. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. [PubMed: 24193818]

Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications; 2014.

Doshmangir L, Azimzadeh S. A comparative study of health financing frameworks. J Health Syst Res. 2018;14(2):142-52. doi:10.22122/jhsr.v14i2.3273

Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research; 2009.

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. [PubMed:24047204]

Preker A, Harding A. Innovations in health service delivery: The corporatization of public hospitals. Washington DC: World Bank; 2003.

Harding A, Preker A. Understanding organizational reform. Washington DC: World Bank; 2000.

Leone R, Homan Z, Bandekow L, Bricknell M. Analysis of international military health systems using the military medical corps worldwide Almanac. Mil Med. 2021;186(9-10):1017-23. doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa376. [PubMed: 33241312]

Mosadeghrad A, Rahimitabar P. Health system governance in Iran: A comparative study. Razi J Med Sci. 2019;26(9):10-28. doi:20.1001.1.22287043.1398.