Keywords
Disasters
Information exchange
Qualitative study
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
Background: Effective communication and timely information exchange during disasters and emergencies can help the responsive organizations prepare better and react rapidly and effectively in order to mitigate losses and casualties.
Objectives: This study summarizes the experiences of experts at Iran’s Relief and Rescue Organization and Emergency Organization with regard to how communication and information exchange contributed in response to the past disasters.
Methods: The content analysis approach was used in this qualitative study. The statistical population included the operational managers and employees of Iran’s Relief and Rescue Organization and Emergency Organization from different provinces with various in managerial and field work's experiences at high, middle, and operational levels as well as experiences with local, provincial, regional, national, and international disasters. The purposive sampling method was employed to collect data through semi-structured interviews with 24 participants. Data analysis was performed in MAXQDA 12.
Results: The results of analyzing the interviews extracted a main theme of communication and information exchange with two categories. The first category was identified as intra-organizational communication and information exchange with seven subcategories called organizational individuals and departments, communication channels, communication model, message content, purpose of communication, standards and instructions, and challenges. The second category was identified as inter-organizational communication and information exchange with six subcategories called organizational individuals and departments, communication channels, communication model, message content, purpose of communication, and challenges.
Conclusion: The participants believed that there were limited horizontal communications and information exchange between Iran’s Relief and Rescue Organization and Iran’s Emergency Organization at the same level via fixed phones, mobile phones, and wireless radios in response to disasters. Therefore, disturbance to accurate timely communication and information exchange between organizations, especially in the first 24 hours of a disaster and lack of inter-organizational agreements and communication infrastructure result in the further vulnerability of victims, Red Crescent rescuers, and emergency technicians.
References
Stute M, Maass M, Schons T, Kaufhold MA, Reuter C, Hollick M. Empirical insights for designing information and communication technology for international disaster response. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020:47:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101598.
Aung E, Whittaker M. Preparing routine health information systems for immediate health responses to disasters. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(5):495-507. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs081. [PubMed: 23002249].
Quero RA. Reframing coordination challenges for public-private partnerships in disaster preparedness. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;57:440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1209.
Drabek TE, Hoetmer GJ. Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. Washington: International City Management Association; 1991.
Seyedin SH, Sajjadi H, Zaboli R. The status of the emergency information and communication system in iran’s health sector. Dir Gen. 2012;9(1):55-63.
Seba A, Nouali-Taboudjemat N, Badache N, Seba H. A review on security challenges of wireless communications in disaster emergency response and crisis management situations. J Netw Comput Appl. 2019;126:150-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.11.010.
Arab M, Zeraati H, Akbari Haghighi F, Ravangard R. A study on the executive managers' knowledge and performance, and their hospitals preparedness against earthquake events and their relationships at public hospitals (affiliated by Tehran university of medical sciences (TUMS) 2005-2006). J Health Admin. 2009;11(34):7-14.
Hosseini Jenab et al., Methods of Needs Assessment and Loss Evaluation in Disasters, Roya Pazhou, (2015), First
Seyedin, S., Sajadi HS, Zaboli, Ra., Status of Information and Communication System of Emergencies and Disasters in Iran’s Health System, Health Information Management
Fant C, Adelman DS, Zak CL, Wood LK. Communicating data and information in disaster care. Nurse Pract. 2020;45(2):48-54. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000651124.68905.bb. [PubMed: 31977622].
Martin-Shields CP. When information becomes action: drivers of individuals' trust in broadcast versus peer-to-peer information in disaster response. Disasters. 2019;43(3):612-33. doi: 10.1111/disa.12349.
Sørensen K. Lack of alignment in emergency response by systems and the public: a dutch disaster health literacy case study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;16(1):25-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.226. [PubMed: 32958081].
Bala H, Venkatesh V, Venkatraman S, Bates J. If the worst happens: five strategies for developing and leveraging information technology-enabled disaster response in healthcare. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20(6):1545-51. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2477371. [PubMed: 26357415].
Benis A, Notea A, Barkan R. Risk and disaster management: from planning and expertise to smart, intelligent, and adaptive systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:286-90. [PubMed: 29677968].
Pourhosseini SS, Ardalan A, Mehrolhassani MH. Key aspects of providing healthcare services in disaster response stage. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):111-8. [PubMed: 26060782].
Vaillancourt A, Haavisto I. Country logistics performance and disaster impact. Disasters. 2016;40(2):262-83. doi: 10.1111/disa.12146. [PubMed: 26282578].
Lai CH, Chib A, Ling R. Digital disparities and vulnerability: mobile phone use, information behaviour, and disaster preparedness in Southeast Asia. Disasters. 2018;42(4):734-60. doi: 10.1111/disa.12279. [PubMed: 29578613].
Phillips SJ. The national library of medicine's disaster information management research center. Front Public Health. 2013;1:1-3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00070. [PubMed: 24380078].
Wang WJ. Disaster response after extreme events in Taiwan: the influence of formal institutions on inter‐organizational interaction. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2019;10(1):74-101. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12155.
Bharosa N, Janssen MF. Reconsidering information management roles and capabilities in disaster response decision-making units. The 6th International ISCRAM Conference. 2009:1-9.
Berchtold C, Vollmer M, Sendrowski P, Neisser F, Müller L, Grigoleit S. Barriers and facilitators in interorganizational disaster response: Identifying examples across Europe. Disaster Risk Sci. 2020;11(1):46-58. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y.
Quarshie AM, Leuschner R. Interorganizational interaction in disaster response networks: A government perspective. J Supply Chain Manag. 2020;56(3):3-25. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12225.
Shahkarami S, Asl IM, Hessam S. Identifying factors affecting coordination factors among disaster management organizations in earthquake-stricken areas of Kermanshah. Disaster Prev Manag. 2021;11(2):191-210.
Bharosa N, Lee J, Janssen M, Rao HR. A case study of information flows in multi-agency emergency response exercises. 10th International Digital Government Research Conference.2009:1-7. doi: 10.1145/1556176.1556226.