Designing and Psychometric Evaluation of Morbid Obesity Quality of life Questionnaire: A Mixed Methods Study


Morbid Obesity
Quality of life

How to Cite

Yazdani , N. ., Sharif , F. ., Elahi , N. ., Ebadi , A. ., & Hosseini, V. . (2020). Designing and Psychometric Evaluation of Morbid Obesity Quality of life Questionnaire: A Mixed Methods Study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 22(11).


Background: Morbid obesity negatively affects all aspects of quality of life (QOL); therefore, the assessment of QOL can be a useful criterion to evaluate obesity outcome.

Objectives: The present study aimed to design a QOL questionnaire in morbid obesity and assess its validation features.

Methods: This sequential-exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted in both qualitative and quantitative stages. The qualitative stage was carried out through 20 semi-structured interviews with morbidly obese people. Furthermore, the initial items of the questionnaire were obtained by a review of related literature. In the next stage, face, content, and construct validity were assessed. The construct validity was examined by exploratory factor analysis with 319 people. Moreover, Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest correlation coefficient were calculated to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis was assessed.

Results: Based on the results of the quantitative stage, an 80-item pool was extracted. The exploratory factor analysis yielded six factors that explained 50.62% of the variance. The factors of one to six were as follows: self-dissatisfaction (15 items), functional disorders (7 items), spiro-mental experiences (11 items), perso-social isolation (7 items), physical changes (7 items), and financial pressure (3 items). The final Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the 50-item questionnaire was calculated at 0.94. Moreover, the intra-class correlation coefficient between the test and retest scores was estimated at 0.97. All indicators of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that goodness of fit was acceptable for each factor. Furthermore, this questionnaire had appropriate interpretability, feasibility, and did not have any floor and ceiling effects.

Conclusion: This valid and reliable questionnaire can be used as a suitable measurement tool for assessing the QOL of morbidly obese people in Iran and other countries with similar cultural features. This questionnaire can improve the quality of future clinical research on obesity. In addition, health care providers can perform a peculiar role in the provision of efficient services to patients to prevent obesity and its associated complications.


  1. Tabrizi JS, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Farahbakhsh M, Nikniaz L, Nikniaz Z. Prevalence and associated factors of overweight or obesity and abdominal obesity in Iranian population: a population-based study of northwestern Iran. Iran J public health. 2018;47(10):1583-92. [PubMed: 30524990].
  2. Bananzadeh A, Hoseini SV, Karami MY, Sohrabi Nazari S. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric cancer incidence. Ann colorectal res. 2015;3(1):e27106.
  3. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
  4. Rahmani A, Sayehmiri K, Asadollahi K, Sarokhani D, Islami F, Sarokhani M. Investigation of the prevalence of obesity in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(10):596-607. [PubMed: 26615371].
  5. Jepsen R, Aadland E, Robertson L, Kolotkin RL, Andersen JR, Natvig GK. Physical activity and quality of life in severely obese adults during a two-year lifestyle intervention programme. J Obes. 2015;2015:314194. doi: 10.1155/2015/314194. [PubMed: 25653871].
  6. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(7):673-89. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x. [PubMed: 25471927].
  7. Kelley CP, Sbrocco G, Sbrocco T. Behavioral modification for the management of obesity. Prim Care. 2016;43(1):159-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.10.004. [PubMed: 26896208].
  8. Park CH, Nam SJ, Choi HS, Kim KO, Kim DH, Kim JW, et al. Comparative efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(7):2180-90. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03831-6. [PubMed: 31037599].
  9. Kahan S. Overweight and obesity management strategies. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(7 Suppl):s186-96. [PubMed: 27356116].
  10. Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Medicine. 2016;4:1-12. doi: 10.1177/2050312116671725. [PubMed: 17757230].
  11. Kolotkin RL, Norquist JM, Crosby RD, Suryawanshi S, Teixeira PJ, Heymsfield SB, et al. One-year health-related quality of life outcomes in weight loss trial participants: comparison of three measures. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2009;7(1):53. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-53. [PubMed: 19505338].
  12. Yazdani N, Sharif F, Elahi N, Ebadi A, Hosseini SV. Psychometric properties of quality of life assessment tools in morbid obesity: a review of literature. Evid Based Care. 2018;7(4):7-21. doi: 10.22038/ebcj.2017.26221.1606.
  13. Tayyem R, Ali A, Atkinson J, Martin CR. Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity. Patient. 2011;4(2):73-87. doi: 10.2165/11584660-000000000-00000. [PubMed: 21766897].
  14. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obesity Surg. 1998;8(5):487-99. doi: 10.1381/096089298765554043. [PubMed: 9819079].
  15. Tayyem RM, Atkinson JM, Martin CR. Development and validation of a new bariatric-specific health-related quality of life instrument''bariatric and obesity-specific survey (BOSS)''. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60(4):357-61. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.143952. [PubMed: 25370541].
  16. Haga BM, Furnes B, Dysvik E, Ueland V. Putting life on hold: Lived experiences of people with obesity. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(2):514-23. doi: 10.1111/scs.12756. [PubMed: 31638725].
  17. World Health Organization. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. Geneva: World Health Organization ;2017.
  18. Krägeloh CU, Billington DR, Henning MA, Chai PPM. Spiritual quality of life and spiritual coping: evidence for a two-factor structure of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0212-x. [PubMed: 25890224].
  19. Jafari-Adli S, Jouyandeh Z, Qorbani M, Soroush A, Larijani B, Hasani-Ranjbar S. Prevalence of obesity and overweight in adults and children in Iran; a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0121-2. [PubMed: 25610814].
  20. Valizadeh Zare N, Mohammadi E, Zarea K, Ehahi N, Manzari Z. The realities of living with a transplanted kidney: A qualitative study. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2015;4(3):e28043. doi: 10.5812/jjcdc.28043v2.
  21. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. [PubMed: 14769454].
  23. Yazdani N, Sharif F, Elahi N, Hosseini SV, Ebadi A. Exploration of the quality of life in iranian morbid obese people: a qualitative study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2019;7(2):138-49. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.44885. [PubMed: 31041324].
  24. Connell J, Carlton J, Grundy A, Buck ET, Keetharuth AD, Ricketts T, et al. The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL). Qual Life Res. 2018;27(7):1893-902. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. [PubMed: 26675691].
  25. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavoosi M, Bagherzadeh R. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh. 2017;3:343-57.
  26. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle‐Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi : 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x. [PubMed: 17535316].
  27. Gilbert GE, Prion S. Making sense of methods and measurement: lawshe's content validity index. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(12):530-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002.
  28. Vakili MM, Jahangiri N. Content validity and reliability of the measurement tools in educational, behavioral, and health sciences research. J Med Educ Dev. 2018;10(28):106-19.
  29. Munro B. Statistical methods for healthcare research& application of SPSS in data analysis. and translators 1st ed Tehran: Jamehnegar, Salemi; 2010.
  30. Kellar SP, Kelvin EA. Munro's statistical methods for health care research: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  31. Özdamar K. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 2 (Çok Değişkenli Analizler. Baskı, Eskişehir; 2010.
  32. Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med care. 1996:34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. [PubMed: 8628042].
  33. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Omidvari S. The Iranian version of 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC public health. 2009;9(1):341. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-341. [PubMed: 19758427].
  34. Littleton HL, Axsom D, Pury CLS. Development of the body image concern inventory. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(2):229-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.006. [PubMed: 15629752].
  35. Basaknejad S, Ghafari M. The relationship between body image concern and psychological disorders in students. J Behav Sci . 2008;1:179-87.
  36. Busutil R, Espallardo O, Torres A, Martínez-Galdeano L, Zozaya N, Á Hidalgo-Vega. The impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in Spain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0773-y. [PubMed: 29017494].
  37. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research: Springer publishing company; 2010.
  38. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. [PubMed: 27330520].
  39. Iordens GIT, Den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer WE, Eygendaal D, Schep NW, Verhofstad MH, et al. minimal important change and other measurement properties of the oxford elbow score and the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter funcsie trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(9): e0182557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182557. [PubMed: 28886018].
  40. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. fourth ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2015. P:534.
  41. Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, Beard DJ, Fitzpatrick R, Price AJ. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e007765. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007765. [PubMed: 26216152].
  42. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [PubMed: 17654487].
  43. Ahadzadeh AS, Rafik-Galea S, Alavi M, Amini M. Relationship between body mass index, body image, and fear of negative evaluation: Moderating role of self-esteem. Health Psychol Open. 2018;5(1):2055102918774251. doi: 10.1177/2055102918774251. [PubMed: 29977587].
  44. Kolotkin RL, Ervin C, Meincke H, Højbjerre L, Fehnel S. Development of a clinical trials version of the impact of weight on quality of life‐lite questionnaire (IWQOL‐lite clinical trials version): results from two qualitative studies. Clin Obes. 2017;7(5):290-9. doi: 10.1111/cob.12197. [PubMed: 28544443].
  45. Therrien F, Marceau P, Turgeon N, Biron S, Richard D, Lacasse Y. The laval questionnaire: a new instrument to measure quality of life in morbid obesity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-66. [PubMed: 21843326].
  46. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(2):157-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1015081805439. [PubMed: 12018739].
  47. Ziegler O, Filipecki J, Girod I, Guillemin F. Development and validation of a french obesity-specific quality of life questionnaire: quality of life, obesity and dietetics (QOLOD) rating scale. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31(3):