Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine is applied for various purposes, such as reducing the time of diagnosis and initiating treatment, quarantining and stabilizing patients, enabling the system to closely monitor the citizens at home, and supporting health professionals.
Objectives: The present study used Scientometrics analysis to comprehensively analyze the body of research conducted on telemedicine regarding COVID-19.
Methods: By using a searching formula, 900 documents were retrieved from the Web of Science. Co-authorship networks were drawn by CiteSpace and Gephi software that are free and powerful illustrating networks. The selected co-authorship indicators were Degree Centrality, Betweenness Centrality, and Closeness Centrality.
Results: Andrea M. Russo had by far a high degree of centrality, compared to other authors. Regarding the countries, Belgium and Portugal had a larger node, indicating that they had a higher degree of centrality. Neurosciences had a large node, showing the higher degree of centrality of this subject area. Psychology and Clinical Neurology were also the nodes with a higher degree of centrality. The degree of centrality was high for the University of Zurich, University of Barcelona, and King College London, and the connections of these nodes were more and even stronger, compared to other nodes.
Conclusion: This study, which was based on 900 scientific credentials in the field of telemedicine during COVID-19, indicated the level of cooperation among authors, countries, and organizations in 2020. Moreover, by presenting different indicators in these networks’ researchers, countries, and key organizations were introduced for each indicator.
- Khemapech I, Sansrimahachai W, Toachoodee M. Telemedicine–Meaning, Challenges and Opportunities. SMJ. 2019;71(3):246-52.
- Nittari G, Khuman R, Baldoni S, Pallotta G, Battineni G, Sirignano A, et al. Telemedicine practice: review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(12):1427-37. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0158. [PMID: 32049608].
- Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare.. 2018;24(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. [PMID: 29320966].
- Vidal-Alaball J, Acosta-Roja R, Hernández NP, Luque US, Morrison D, Pérez SN, et al. Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Aten Primaria. 2020;52(6):418-422. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.04.003 [ PMID: 32402477].
- Armfield NR, Edirippulige S, Caffery LJ, Bradford NK, Grey JW, Smith AC. Telemedicine–a bibliometric and content analysis of 17,932 publication records. Int J Med Inform. 2014; 83(10): 715-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.001. [PMID:25066950].
- 6. Jiang LC, Wang Z-Z, Peng T-Q, Zhu JJ. The divided communities of shared concerns: Mapping the intellectual structure of e-Health research in social science journals. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.003. [PMID: 25277295]
- Kim MC, Jeong YK, Song M. Investigating the integrated landscape of the intellectual topology of bioinformatics. Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):309-35. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1417-1
- Winnink J, Tijssen RJ. R&D dynamics and scientific breakthroughs in HIV/AIDS drugs development: the case of integrase inhibitors. Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1330-7.
- Fang Y. Visualizing the structure and the evolving of digital medicine: a scientometrics review. Scientometrics. 2015; 105(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1696-1.
- Wang M, Liu P, Zhang R, Li Z, Li X. A Scientometric Analysis of Global Health Research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082963. [PMID: 32344668].
- Velmurugan C, Radhakrishnan N. A Scientometric Analysis of Research Papers Published on Pharmacognosy as reflected in the Web of Science. ADV Phyto& Pharm. 2015;1(1):27-40.
- Naveed S, Waqas A, Majeed S, Zeshan M, Jahan N, Sheikh MH. Child psychiatry: A scientometric analysis 1980-2016. F1000Research. 2017;6:1293. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12069.1. [PMID: 28944045].
- Chang Y-H, Chang C-Y, Tseng Y-H. Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. J Sci Educ Technol. 2010;19(4):315-31. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2.
- Groneberg DA, Rahimian S, Bundschuh M, Schwarzer M, Gerber A, Kloft B. Telemedicine–a scientometric and density equalizing analysis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12995-015-0076-3. [PMID: 26500688]
- Waqas A, Teoh SH, Lapão LV, Messina LA, Correia JC. Harnessing Telemedicine for the Provision of Health Care: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e18835. doi: 10.2196/18835. [PMID: 33006571].
- Haghani M, Bliemer MC, Goerlandt F, Li J. The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review. Saf Sci. 2020;129:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104806.
- Colavizza G, Costas R, Traag VA, Van Eck NJ, Van Leeuwen T, Waltman L. A scientometric overview of CORD-19. Plos One. 2021;16(1): e0244839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244839. [PMID: 33411846]
- Safdari R, Gholamzadeh M, Rezayi S, Tanhapour M, Saeedi S. Telehealth and Telemedicine in Response to Critical Coronavirus: A Systematic Review. IRCMJ. 2021;23(9).1-8. doi: 10.32592/ircmj.2021.23.9.1150.
- Olmeda‐Gómez C, Perianes‐Rodriguez A, Ovalle‐Perandones MA, Guerrero‐Bote VP, de Moya Anegón F, editors. Visualization of scientific co‐authorship in Spanish universities. Aslib Proc, 2009:61(1):83-100. doi: 10.1108/00012530910932302.
- Hariri N. Co-authorship networks of Iranian articles in library and information science, psychology, management and economics in ISI during 2000-2009. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2011;26(4):825-44.
- Della Gatta AN, Rizzo R, Pilu G, Simonazzi GJAJoO, Gynecology. COVID19 during pregnancy: a systematic review of reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.013. [PMID:32311350].
- Farooq M, Hafeez AJapa. Covid-resnet: A deep learning framework for screening of covid19 from radiographs. ArXiv. 2020;42(1):1-6.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.14395
- Osareh F, Serati Shirazi M, Khademi R. A Survey on Co-authorship Network of Iranian Researchers in the field of Pharmacy and Pharmacology in Web of Science during 2000-2012.JHA. 2014;17(56):33-45.
- Parish AJ, Boyack KW, Ioannidis JPJPo. Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189742.[ PMID:29320509].
- Acedo FJ, Barroso C, Casanueva C, Galán JLJJoMS. Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. J Manag Stud. 2006; 43(5):957-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
- Wang Y, Wu Y, Pan Y, Ma Z, Rousseau RJS. Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics. 2005;62(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0013-9.
- Askari A, Khodaie M, Bahaadinbeigy KJJot. The 60 most highly cited articles published in the Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and Telemedicine Journal and E-health. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13519899.
- Ohannessian R, Yaghobian S, Chaleuil M, Salles N. Telemedicine in France: A review of registered clinical trials from 2000 to 2015. Eur Res Telemed. 2016;5(2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eurtel.2016.04.001.
- 29. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(4):211-20. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120219. [PMID: 22674020].
- Correia JC, Lapão LV, Mingas RF, Augusto HA, Balo MB, Maia MR, et al. Implementation of a telemedicine network in Angola: challenges and opportunities. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2018;12(1). 1-14.