Document Type : Research articles


1 2. Postdoctoral Researcher, Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. Assistant Professor, Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 1. Assistant Professor, Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran 2. Assistant Professor, Iran-Helal Institute of Applied-Science and Technology, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran


Introduction: The preparedness of families for the disasters can set auspicious grounds for the preparedness of the whole society. In Iran health system, Household Disaster Preparedness Index (HDPI) that is composed of 15 items is applied for assessing the household preparedness in disasters. This study was conducted to investigate the reliability and validity of this index.
Methods: In order to investigate the HDPI reliability, we two methods, namely internal consistency and stability determination, are. In order to investigate HDPI validity, we examined the face validity, content validity and construct validity. To do so, besides interviewing with the experts and family heads, 200 families were selected based on multistage cluster sampling method from amongst a study population that included the families in all the counties in Isfahan Province. Use has been made in content validity investigation of both qualitative and quantitative methods; and, in investigating the construct validity, exploratory factor analysis was the method of choice.
Results: The amount of HDPI internal consistency was calculated 0.786 which is in an acceptable range. HDPI stability, as well, was computed 0.98 using the test-retest method which is also in an optimal level. Therefore, it can be stated that HDPI enjoys the required reliability. Investigation of HDPI face validity indicated that the families have problems in perceiving some of the items of this index. The experts presented suggestions for improving the HDPI content validity following the qualitative investigation of the content validity. In the investigation of the content validity ratio (CVR), all the items, except the ones numbered 1, 3 and 4 were in an acceptable range; however, the investigation of the content validity index (CVI) indicated that only the validity of the items numbered 12 and 13 was acceptable in terms of all the three scales of relevancy, clarity and simplicity. To determine the construct validity, we used exploratory factor analysis to extract five factors (subscales), namely reduction of vulnerability, planning for disasters, family empowerment, procurement of resources for disasters and specialized programs. The internal consistency of these subscales indicated that only the internal consistencies of the first and the second factors were in an acceptable range.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that although HDPI was a reliable measure, it did not enjoy the required validity for assessing the household preparedness in disasters.


  1. Ardalan A, Sohrabizadeh S. Assessing households preparedness for earthquakes: an exploratory study in the development of a valid and reliable Persian-version tool. PLoS Curr. 2016;8:ecurrents. . doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.ccc8697279713e66887b928b839d0920. [PubMed: 26981326].
  2. Joffe H, Perez-Fuentes G, Potts HW, Rossetto T. How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: the fix-it intervention. Natural Hazards. 2016;84(3):1943-65. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1.
  3. Chaney PL, Weaver GS, Youngblood SA, Pitts K. Household preparedness for tornado hazards: the 2011 disaster in DeKalb County, Alabama. Weath Clim Soci. 2013;5(4):345-58. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00046.1.
  4. Der-Martirosian C, Strine T, Atia M, Chu K, Mitchell MN, Dobalian A. General household emergency preparedness: a comparison between veterans and nonveterans. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):134-40. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1400020X. [PubMed: 24642181].
  5. Murti M, Bayleyegn T, Stanbury M, Flanders WD, Yard E, Nyaku M, et al. Household emergency preparedness by housing type from a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER), Michigan. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(1):12-9. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.111. [PubMed: 24524350].
  6. Chan EY, Kim JH, Lin C, Cheung EY, Lee PP. Is previous disaster experience a good predictor for disaster preparedness in extreme poverty households in remote Muslim minority based community in China? J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(3):466-72. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9761-9. [PubMed: 23264186].
  7. Uscher-Pines L, Chandra A, Acosta J. Household preparedness is not enough: the challenges and opportunities in assessing community readiness for disasters. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19:S70-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318294ea11. [PubMed: 23903399].
  8. Ardalan A. Institutional approach in developing health emergency preparedness: the case of I.R.Iran. 7th International Congress on Health in Emergencies and Disasters, Tehran, Iran; 2016.
  9. De Vaus D. Survey in social research. London, England: Routledge; 1990.
  10. Najafi F, Kheiry B. Investigating the impact of country of origin on customer behavior: investigation of the moderating roles of product involvement and product familiarity on product evaluation and customer behavioral intentions. J Market Manag. 2013;7(17):37-60.
  11. Azadian S, Shirali GA, Saki A. Designing a questionnaire to assess crisis management based on a resilience engineering approach. Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2014;6(1):245-56.
  12. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [PubMed: 17654487].
  13. Hyrkäs K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(6):619-25. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00036-1. [PubMed: 12834927].
  14. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003;27(2):94-104.
  15. Lang WS, Wilkerson JR. Accuracy vs. validity, consistency vs. reliability, and fairness vs. absence of bias: a call for quality. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE), New Orleans, Louisiana; 2008.
  16. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 3E. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 1994.
  17. Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Measur. 2006;66(3):393-416. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282485.
  18. Kellar SP, Kelvin EA. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  19. McClure J, Walkey F, Allen M. When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: Attributions, locus of control and attitudes to risk. Appl Psychol. 1999;48(2):239-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00060.x.
  20. Showalter PS. Prognostication of doom: an earthquake prediction's effect on four small communities. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993;11(3):279-92.
  21. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Iowa: The University of Iowa; 2016.
  22. Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res Methods. 2004;7(2):191-205. doi: 10.1177/1094428104263675.
  23. Şakiroğlu M. Variables related to earthquake preparedness behavior. [Master Thesis]. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University; 2005.
  24. Page L, Rubin J, Amlôt R, Simpson J, Wessely S. Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London bombings. Biosecur Bioterror: 2008;6(4):309-19. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0043. [PubMed: 19117430].
  25. Murphy ST, Cody M, Frank LB, Glik D, Ang A. Predictors of emergency preparedness and compliance. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(2):1-10. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181a9c6c5. [PubMed: 19590429].
  26. Henderson TL, Miller S, Hendrix J, Dinh M. Checklist for disaster preparedness. Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University; 2010.
  27. Council for Excellence in Goverment. Are we ready? Introducing the public readiness index: a survey-based tool to measure the preparedness of individuals, families and communities. Washington, D.C: Council for Excellence in Goverment; 2006.