Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Application of the One-Stop Cardiac CT Scan on 256-Row Wide Detector Revolution CT in Myocardial Ischemia of Aortic Valve Degeneration Diagnosis

Xuefang Lu 1 , * , Wei Gong 1 and Yunfei Zha 1 , **
Authors Information
1 Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Corresponding Authors:
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: 21 (3); e83343
  • Published Online: April 15, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 15, 2018
  • Revised: April 1, 2019
  • Accepted: April 3, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.83343

To Cite: Lu X, Gong W, Zha Y. Application of the One-Stop Cardiac CT Scan on 256-Row Wide Detector Revolution CT in Myocardial Ischemia of Aortic Valve Degeneration Diagnosis, Iran Red Crescent Med J. Online ahead of Print ; 21(3):e83343. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.83343.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Driessen RS, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Danad I, Min JK, Leipsic JA, et al. Effect of plaque burden and morphology on myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(5):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.054. [PubMed: 29406855].
  • 2. Ahmadi A, Leipsic J, Ovrehus KA, Gaur S, Bagiella E, Ko B, et al. Lesion-specific and vessel-related determinants of fractional flow reserve beyond coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(4):521-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.020. [PubMed: 29311033].
  • 3. Nerlekar N, Ha FJ, Cheshire C, Rashid H, Cameron JD, Wong DT, et al. Computed tomographic coronary angiography-derived plaque characteristics predict major adverse cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(1). e006973. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006973. [PubMed: 29305348].
  • 4. Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R. 2017 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in valvular heart disease. Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;10(24):122-36.
  • 5. Zhang YD, Li M, Qi L, Wu CJ, Wang X. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Cardiac structural and microvascular abnormalities as evaluated with multi-parametric MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(8):1480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.028. [PubMed: 26003194].
  • 6. Ziadi MC. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT): Clinical impact in diagnosis and prognosis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(2):206-18. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.04.10. [PubMed: 28540215]. [PubMed Central: PMC5422840].
  • 7. Pontone G, Rabbat MG, Guaricci AI. Stress computed tomographic perfusion: Are we ready for the green light? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006324. [PubMed: 28389508].
  • 8. Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH, Kang JW, Ahn JM, Kweon J, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(4):432-40. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew094. [PubMed: 27354345].
  • 9. Rajamannan NM. Calcific aortic valve disease in familial hypercholesterolemia: The LDL-density-gene effect. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(24):2696-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.011. [PubMed: 26700831].
  • 10. Coenen A, Rossi A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, Kono AK, Chelu RG, et al. Integrating CT myocardial perfusion and CT-FFR in the work-up of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(7):760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.028. [PubMed: 28109933].
  • 11. Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Mushtaq S, Baggiano A, et al. Rationale and design of the perfection (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography perfusion versus fractional flow reserve measured by computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease) prospective study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(4):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.004. [PubMed: 27050025].
  • 12. Wei F, Sun N, Cai C, Feng S, Tian J, Shi W, et al. Associations between serum uric acid and the incidence of hypertension: A Chinese senior dynamic cohort study. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0866-0. [PubMed: 27129957]. [PubMed Central: PMC4851787].
  • 13. Matveeva A, Schmitt RR, Edtinger K, Wagner M, Kerber S, Deneke T, et al. Coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Standard-dose and low-dose imaging with a high-resolution whole-heart CT scanner. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(8):3432-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5282-1. [PubMed: 29426987].
  • 14. Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Rivera JJ, Khan AN, Santos RD, Shaw LJ, et al. Relation of aortic valve calcium detected by cardiac computed tomography to all-cause mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(12):1787-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.019. [PubMed: 21055710].
  • 15. Ten Kate GR, Bos S, Dedic A, Neefjes LA, Kurata A, Langendonk JG, et al. Increased aortic valve calcification in familial hypercholesterolemia: Prevalence, extent, and associated risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(24):2687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.087. [PubMed: 26700830].
  • 16. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Mancini ME, Conte E, Guglielmo M, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of coronary CT angiography performed with whole-heart coverage CT scanner with intra-cycle motion correction algorithm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(4):1383-92. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5131-2. [PubMed: 29164383].
  • 17. Kang SJ, Yang DH, Koo HJ, Yun SC, Lee JG, Kang JW, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived morphological predictors of myocardial ischemia assessed by stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(7):E207-16. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26710. [PubMed: 27567025].
  • 18. Bosse K, Hans CP, Zhao N, Koenig SN, Huang N, Guggilam A, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide signaling regulates Notch1 in aortic valve disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;60:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.001. [PubMed: 23583836]. [PubMed Central: PMC4058883].
  • 19. Myles V, Liao J, Warnock JN. Cyclic pressure and angiotensin II influence the biomechanical properties of aortic valves. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(1):11011. doi: 10.1115/1.4026041. [PubMed: 24240552].
  • 20. Keir M, Spears D, Caldarone C, Crean AM. Proving the innocence of a "malignant" coronary artery: Calling dobutamine stress CT for the defence!. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(1):68-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.07.006. [PubMed: 27431606].
  • 21. Latif N, Sarathchandra P, Chester AH, Yacoub MH. Expression of smooth muscle cell markers and co-activators in calcified aortic valves. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(21):1335-45. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht547. [PubMed: 24419809].
  • 22. Venardos N, Nadlonek NA, Zhan Q, Weyant MJ, Reece TB, Meng X, et al. Aortic valve calcification is mediated by a differential response of aortic valve interstitial cells to inflammation. J Surg Res. 2014;190(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.051. [PubMed: 24746950]. [PubMed Central: PMC4053510].
  • 23. Albrecht MH, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ, Jacobs BE, Bayer R2, Litwin SE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5):2134-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5150-z. [PubMed: 29181587].
  • 24. Pelgrim GJ, Duguay TM, Stijnen JM, Varga-Szemes A, Van Tuijl S, Schoepf UJ, et al. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.01.012. [PubMed: 28202246].
  • 25. Li Y, Yu M, Li W, Lu Z, Wei M, Zhang J. Third generation dual-source CT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary restenosis in all size stents with low radiation dose and preserved image quality. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2647-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5256-3. [PubMed: 29349698].
  • 26. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):342-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003. [PubMed: 25301040].
  • 27. Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK. Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(8):836-44. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew044. [PubMed: 27013250]. [PubMed Central: PMC4955293].
  • 28. Pontone G, Muscogiuri G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Mushtaq S, et al. The new frontier of cardiac computed tomography angiography: Fractional flow reserve and stress myocardial perfusion. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016;18(12):74. doi: 10.1007/s11936-016-0493-3. [PubMed: 27783337].
  • 29. Udholm PM, Linde JJ, Barton R, Kuhl JT, Hove JD, Sorgaard M, et al. Functional impact of atherosclerosis on epicardial coronary conductance vessels assessed With MDCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(4):490-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.004. [PubMed: 27209108].
  • 30. Penagaluri A, Higgins AY, Vavere AL, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, Betoko A, et al. Computed tomographic perfusion improves diagnostic power of coronary computed tomographic angiography in women: Analysis of the CORE320 trial (coronary artery evaluation using 320-row multidetector computed tomography angiography and myocardial perfusion) according to gender. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005189. [PubMed: 27811151].
  • 31. Michelsen MM, Mygind ND, Frestad D, Prescott E. Women with stable angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: Closer to a diagnosis. Eur Cardiol. 2017;12(1):14-9. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2016:33:2. [PubMed: 30416544]. [PubMed Central: PMC6206464].
  • 32. Kuhl JT, George RT, Mehra VC, Linde JJ, Chen M, Arai AE, et al. Endocardial-epicardial distribution of myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by multidetector computed tomography in symptomatic patients without significant coronary artery disease: insights from the CORE320 multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(7):779-87. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev206. [PubMed: 26341292]. [PubMed Central: PMC5006103].
  • 33. Ladeiras-Lopes R, Bettencourt N, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Santos L, et al. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(3):215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.013. [PubMed: 26869367].
  • 34. Marini C, Seitun S, Zawaideh C, Bauckneht M, Morelli MC, Ameri P, et al. Comparison of coronary flow reserve estimated by dynamic radionuclide SPECT and multi-detector x-ray CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(5):1712-21. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0492-5. [PubMed: 27151303].
  • 35. Cademartiri F, Seitun S, Clementeetal A. Myocardialblood ow quanti cation for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(2):129-50.
  • 36. Sicari R, Cortigiani L. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017;15(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0099-2. [PubMed: 28327159]. [PubMed Central: PMC5361820].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments