IF: 0.644
REUTERS THOMSON

A Comparison between the Efficacy of Iranian and Syrian Hydrogel Dressings on Wound Healing in Rats

AUTHORS

MH Dashti-Rahmatabadi 1 , MT Noorbala 2 , *

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Department of Physiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciencse, Iran

2 Department of Dermatology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, mtnoorbala@gmail.com, Iran

How to Cite: Dashti-Rahmatabadi M, Noorbala M. A Comparison between the Efficacy of Iranian and Syrian Hydrogel Dressings on Wound Healing in Rats, Iran Red Crescent Med J. Online ahead of Print ; 13(5):338-341.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: 13 (5); 338-341
Article Type: Brief Report
Received: October 10, 2010
Accepted: December 10, 2010

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Following the production of Syrian gel, the scientists from Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, in cooperation with researchers in Yazd Atomic Energy Commission Radiation Processing Center in Iran, have manufactured a hydrogel wound dressing. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these two hydrogels.

Methods: In this study, 32 male Wistar rats underwent a full thickness circular skin wound on the dorsum under light anesthesia. Animals were divided into two groups. Wounds in the 1st group were dressed by the Syrian hydrogel and in the 2nd group by Iranian gel. Wound contraction rate was determined on days 1, 3, 7 and 12 for comparing the wound healing rate in two groups. Laboratory investigation of blood samples, skin tensile strength and histopathology of repaired skins were also evaluated.

Results: Wound contraction ratio on 7th and 12th days in Iranian gel was significantly greater than Syrian gel group. According to histopathological evaluations, wound repair in 63.6% of specimens in Iranian gel group was excellent and in 35.5% good while in Syrian gel group, 54.5% of repaired wounds were graded as excellent and 1 case showed to be in a weak repairing state. A significant difference was noticed in wound repair patterns between the two groups. The differences in skin tensile strength in two groups on days 15 and 30 were not significant.

Conclusion: According to our findings Iranian and Syrian hydrogels did not show any adverse effects on wound healing in rats and could be easily removed from the wound area without any trauma. However Iranian hydrogel dressings were more effective in wound repair regarding wound contraction rate and histopathological evaluation of the skin specimens in the region of healed wounds.

Keywords

Hydrogel Dressing Wound healing Iran Syria Rat

© 0, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: