Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Married Women’s Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire; A Developmental and Psychometric Evaluation

Zahra Shahvari 1 , * , Firoozeh Raisi 2 , Zohre Parsa Yekta 3 , Abbas Ebadi 4 and Anoshirvan Kazemnejad 5
Authors Information
1 Department of Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Psychiatric and Clinical Psychology Research Center, Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
3 Department of Medical Surgical, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Behavioral Sciences Research Center (BSRC), Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
5 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiyat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: April 2015, 17 (4); e59654
  • Published Online: April 25, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 28, 2014
  • Revised: February 11, 2015
  • Accepted: February 27, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.17(4)2015.26488

To Cite: Shahvari Z, Raisi F, Parsa Yekta Z, Ebadi A, Kazemnejad A. Married Women’s Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire; A Developmental and Psychometric Evaluation, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 ; 17(4):e59654. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17(4)2015.26488.

Copyright © 2015, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Malarcher S. Social determinants of sexual and reproductive health: informing future research and programme implementation/edited by Shawn Malarcher. 2010;
  • 2. Schwartz P, Young L. Sexual satisfaction in committed relationships. Sex Res Social Policy. 2009; 6(1): 1-17
  • 3. Santtila P, Wager I, Witting K, Harlaar N, Jern P, Johansson A, et al. Discrepancies between sexual desire and sexual activity: Gender differences and associations with relationship satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007; 34(1): 31-44
  • 4. Arrington R, Cofrancesco J, Wu AW. Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(10): 1643-58[PubMed]
  • 5. Sprecher S. The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships. 2004;
  • 6. Whipple B, Brash-McGreer K. Management of female sexual dysfunction Sexual function in people with disability and chronic illness A Health Professional's Guide Gaithersburg. 1997;
  • 7. Neto F. The Satisfaction With Sex Life Scale. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2011; 45(1): 18-31
  • 8. Parish WL, Luo Y, Stolzenberg R, Laumann EO, Farrer G, Pan S. Sexual practices and sexual satisfaction: a population based study of Chinese urban adults. Arch Sex Behav. 2007; 36(1): 5-20[PubMed]
  • 9. Hurlbert DF, Apt C, Rabehl SM. Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: an examination of women in nondistressed marriages. J Sex Marital Ther. 1993; 19(2): 154-65[PubMed]
  • 10. Haavio-Mannila E, Kontula O. Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Arch Sex Behav. 1997; 26(4): 399-419[PubMed]
  • 11. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-5®). 2013;
  • 12. Song JA, Bergen MB, Schumm WR. Sexual satisfaction among Korean-American couples in the Midwestern United States. J Sex Marital Ther. 1995; 21(3): 147-58[PubMed]
  • 13. Salehi M, Haghani F. Compiling of curriculum for the Master of Science in genetic counseling. J Educ Health Promot. 2014; 3: 3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Agha-hosseini M, Dadras N, Roodsari AA, Tabatabaeefar L, et al. Psychometric properties of Sexual Function Questionnaire: evaluation of an Iranian sample. Iran J Reprod Med. 2006; 4(1): 23-8
  • 15. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. 2014;
  • 16. Schwartz Barcott D, Kim HS. An expansion and elaboration of the hybrid model of concept development. Concept Dev Nurs Found Tech Appl. 2000; 2: 161-92
  • 17. Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F. Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J. 2002; 19(3): 499-503[PubMed]
  • 18. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Streiner DL, King DR. Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(3): 233-8[PubMed]
  • 19. Lawshe CH. A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Pers Psychol. 1975; 28(4): 563-75
  • 20. Waltz C, Bausell R. Nursing Research: Design, Statistics and Computer Analysis . 1983;
  • 21. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007; 30(4): 459-67[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Hyrkas K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003; 40(6): 619-25[PubMed]
  • 23. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003; 27(2): 94-104
  • 24. Patrick DL, Edwards TC, Topolski TD. Adolescent quality of life, part II: initial validation of a new instrument. J Adolesc. 2002; 25(3): 287-300[PubMed]
  • 25. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 2005;
  • 26. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research: Educational, psychological and sociological inquiry. 1973;
  • 27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. Bmj. 1997; 314(7080): 572
  • 28. Fox DJ. Fundamentals of research in nursing. 1982;
  • 29. Burns N, Grove S. Understanding Nursing Research. 2003;
  • 30. de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004; 24(4): 257-73[PubMed]
  • 31. Fahs B, Swank E. Social identities as predictors of women's sexual satisfaction and sexual activity. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40(5): 903-14[PubMed]
  • 32. Walker L, Avant K. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 1995;
  • 33. Hudson WW, Harrison DF, Crosscup PC. A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. J Sex Res. 1981; 17(2): 157-74
  • 34. Pinney EM, Gerrard M, Denney NW. The pinney sexual satisfaction inventory. J Sex Res. 1987; 23(2): 233-51
  • 35. Shadman Z, Akhoundan M, Poorsoltan N, Larijani B, Arzaghi SM, Khoshniat M. Factors associated with sexual function in Iranian women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: partner relationship as the most important predictor. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(3)[PubMed]
  • 36. Meston C, Trapnell P. Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). J Sex Med. 2005; 2(1): 66-81[PubMed]
  • 37. Stulhofer A, Busko V, Brouillard P. Development and bicultural validation of the new sexual satisfaction scale. J Sex Res. 2010; 47(4): 257-68[DOI][PubMed]
  • 38. Acitelli LK, Kenny DA, Weiner D. The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Pers Relatsh. 2001; 8(2): 167-85
  • 39. Lee JT. The meaning of sexual satisfaction in pregnant Taiwanese women. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002; 47(4): 278-86[PubMed]
  • 40. Hattie J, Cooksey RW. Procedures for Assessing the Validities of Tests Using the "Known-Groups" Method. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1984; 8(3): 295-305
  • 41. Sauro J. Are both positive and negative items necessary in questionnaires? 2011;
  • 42. Barlow DH, Hersen M. Single case experimental designs. Food Agric Organ United Nation. 1984;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments