Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Gadolinium Enhanced MR-angiography Results in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Positive Predictive Value Compared to Surgery

Seyed Rasool Mirsharifi 1 , Morteza Noaparast 1 , * , Mona Khazravi 1 , Hossein Ghanaati 2 , Madjid Shakiba 2 and Amirsina Sharifi 2
Authors Information
1 Department of General Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: December 01, 2014, 16 (12); e26033
  • Published Online: December 25, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 11, 2014
  • Revised: December 23, 2014
  • Accepted: December 27, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.26033

To Cite: Mirsharifi S R, Noaparast M, Khazravi M, Ghanaati H, Shakiba M, et al. Gadolinium Enhanced MR-angiography Results in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Positive Predictive Value Compared to Surgery, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 ; 16(12):e26033. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.26033.

Copyright © 2014, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Geramizadeh B, Motevalli D, Nikeghbalian S, Malek Hosseini SA. Histopathology of post-transplant liver biopsies, the first report from iran. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(6)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Pasternak RC, Criqui MH, Benjamin EJ, Fowkes FG, Isselbacher EM, McCullough PA, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group I: epidemiology. Circulation. 2004; 109(21): 2605-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Hodnett PA, Ward EV, Davarpanah AH, Scanlon TG, Collins JD, Glielmi CB, et al. Peripheral arterial disease in a symptomatic diabetic population: prospective comparison of rapid unenhanced MR angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced MRA. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(6): 1466-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Menke J, Larsen J. Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(5): 325-34[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Collins TC, Petersen NJ, Suarez-Almazor M, Ashton CM. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(12): 1469-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Rowe VL, Lee W, Weaver FA, Etzioni D. Patterns of treatment for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: 1996-2005. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(4): 910-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Dhangana R, Murphy TP, Coll JR, Ahn SH, Zafar AM, Qadeer FF, et al. Prevalence of abnormal ankle-brachial index among individuals with low or intermediate Framingham Risk Scores. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22(8): 1077-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006; 113(11)-654[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Lin PH, Bechara C, Kougias P, Huynh TT, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS. Assessment of aortic pathology and peripheral arterial disease using multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008; 42(6): 583-98[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Iwai T, Izumi T, Inoue T, Maegawa J, Fuwa N, Mitsudo K, et al. Occipital artery arising from the anterior aspect of the internal carotid artery identified by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(2): 103-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Shabestari AA, Akhlaghpoor S, Tayebivaljozi R, Fattahi Masrour F. Prevalence of Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies and Variants in 2697 Consecutive Patients Using 64-Detector Row Coronary CTAngiography. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(3): 111-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sharafi A, Abahashemi F, Hashemi H, Jalali AH, et al. Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Radiol. 2013; 10(3): 111-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Alswat KA, Sanai FM, Altuwaijri M, Albenmousa A, Almadi M, Al-Hamoudi WK, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a middle eastern population. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(5)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Pan FS, Xu M, Wang W, Zhou LY, Xie XY. Infantile hepatic hemangioendothelioma in comparison with hepatoblastoma in children: clinical and ultrasound features. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(8)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Lakshminarayan R, Simpson JO, Ettles DF. Magnetic resonance angiography: current status in the planning and follow-up of endovascular treatment in lower-limb arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009; 32(3): 397-405[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ. MR angiography of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(6): 1675-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Nazarpoor M, Poureisa M, Daghighi MH. Comparison of maximum signal intensity of contrast agent on t1-weighted images using spin echo, fast spin echo and inversion recovery sequences. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 10(1): 27-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(2): 586-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Wertman R, Altun E, Martin DR, Mitchell DG, Leyendecker JR, O'Malley RB, et al. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: evaluation of gadolinium chelate contrast agents at four American universities. Radiology. 2008; 248(3): 799-806[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, Cowper SE. Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology. 2007; 242(3): 647-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. JL M. Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. 2010;
  • 22. Creager MA. Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2011;
  • 23. Ozkan B, Gungor D, Yildirim UM, Harman A, Ozen O, Aytekin C. Endovascular stent placement of juxtaanastomotic stenosis in native arteriovenous fistula after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty. Iran J Radiol. 2013; 10(3): 133-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A, 2nd., Sheng R, Omniscan MRA Investigator Panel. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(6): 1402-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Diop AD, Braidy C, Habouchi A, Niang K, Gageanu C, Boyer L, et al. Unenhanced 3D turbo spin-echo MR angiography of lower limbs in peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(5): 1145-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Nielsen YJ. Whole-body MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Dan Med Bull. 2010; 57(12)[PubMed]
  • 27. Binkert CA, Baker PD, Petersen BD, Szumowski J, Kaufman JA. Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard bolus-chase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography. Radiology. 2004; 232(3): 860-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Pattynama PM, van Sambeek MR, de Haan MW, Stijnen T, et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2005; 236(3): 1094-103[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kitslaar PE, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2005; 235(2): 699-708[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Noaparast M, Rabani A, Karimian F, Bodaghabadi M, Aran S, Mirsharifi R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sixty Four Multi-Slice CT Angiography in Assessment of Arterial Cut-Off and Run-Off in Comparison with Surgical Findings. Iran J Radiol. 2011; 8(2): 89-96[PubMed]
  • 31. Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH, Scanlon TG, Collins JD, Sheehan JJ, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology. 2011; 260(1): 282-93[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Wang J, Yan F, Liu J, Lu J, Li D, Luan J, et al. Multicenter, intra-individual comparison of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of the peripheral arteries (the Peripheral VALUE Study). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 38(4): 926-37[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments