Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Gadolinium Enhanced MR-angiography Results in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Positive Predictive Value Compared to Surgery

Seyed Rasool Mirsharifi 1 , Morteza Noaparast 1 , * , Mona Khazravi 1 , Hossein Ghanaati 2 , Madjid Shakiba 2 and Amirsina Sharifi 2
Authors Information
1 Department of General Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: December 01, 2014, 16 (12); e26033
  • Published Online: December 25, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 11, 2014
  • Revised: December 23, 2014
  • Accepted: December 27, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.26033

To Cite: Mirsharifi S R, Noaparast M, Khazravi M, Ghanaati H, Shakiba M, et al. Gadolinium Enhanced MR-angiography Results in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Positive Predictive Value Compared to Surgery, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 ; 16(12):e26033. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.26033.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Geramizadeh B, Motevalli D, Nikeghbalian S, Malek Hosseini SA. Histopathology of post-transplant liver biopsies, the first report from iran. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(6)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Pasternak RC, Criqui MH, Benjamin EJ, Fowkes FG, Isselbacher EM, McCullough PA, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group I: epidemiology. Circulation. 2004; 109(21): 2605-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Hodnett PA, Ward EV, Davarpanah AH, Scanlon TG, Collins JD, Glielmi CB, et al. Peripheral arterial disease in a symptomatic diabetic population: prospective comparison of rapid unenhanced MR angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced MRA. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(6): 1466-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Menke J, Larsen J. Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(5): 325-34[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Collins TC, Petersen NJ, Suarez-Almazor M, Ashton CM. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(12): 1469-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Rowe VL, Lee W, Weaver FA, Etzioni D. Patterns of treatment for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: 1996-2005. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(4): 910-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Dhangana R, Murphy TP, Coll JR, Ahn SH, Zafar AM, Qadeer FF, et al. Prevalence of abnormal ankle-brachial index among individuals with low or intermediate Framingham Risk Scores. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22(8): 1077-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006; 113(11)-654[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Lin PH, Bechara C, Kougias P, Huynh TT, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS. Assessment of aortic pathology and peripheral arterial disease using multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008; 42(6): 583-98[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Iwai T, Izumi T, Inoue T, Maegawa J, Fuwa N, Mitsudo K, et al. Occipital artery arising from the anterior aspect of the internal carotid artery identified by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(2): 103-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Shabestari AA, Akhlaghpoor S, Tayebivaljozi R, Fattahi Masrour F. Prevalence of Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies and Variants in 2697 Consecutive Patients Using 64-Detector Row Coronary CTAngiography. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(3): 111-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sharafi A, Abahashemi F, Hashemi H, Jalali AH, et al. Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Radiol. 2013; 10(3): 111-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Alswat KA, Sanai FM, Altuwaijri M, Albenmousa A, Almadi M, Al-Hamoudi WK, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a middle eastern population. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(5)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Pan FS, Xu M, Wang W, Zhou LY, Xie XY. Infantile hepatic hemangioendothelioma in comparison with hepatoblastoma in children: clinical and ultrasound features. Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(8)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Lakshminarayan R, Simpson JO, Ettles DF. Magnetic resonance angiography: current status in the planning and follow-up of endovascular treatment in lower-limb arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009; 32(3): 397-405[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ. MR angiography of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(6): 1675-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Nazarpoor M, Poureisa M, Daghighi MH. Comparison of maximum signal intensity of contrast agent on t1-weighted images using spin echo, fast spin echo and inversion recovery sequences. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 10(1): 27-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(2): 586-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Wertman R, Altun E, Martin DR, Mitchell DG, Leyendecker JR, O'Malley RB, et al. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: evaluation of gadolinium chelate contrast agents at four American universities. Radiology. 2008; 248(3): 799-806[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, Cowper SE. Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology. 2007; 242(3): 647-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. JL M. Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. 2010;
  • 22. Creager MA. Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2011;
  • 23. Ozkan B, Gungor D, Yildirim UM, Harman A, Ozen O, Aytekin C. Endovascular stent placement of juxtaanastomotic stenosis in native arteriovenous fistula after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty. Iran J Radiol. 2013; 10(3): 133-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A, 2nd., Sheng R, Omniscan MRA Investigator Panel. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(6): 1402-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Diop AD, Braidy C, Habouchi A, Niang K, Gageanu C, Boyer L, et al. Unenhanced 3D turbo spin-echo MR angiography of lower limbs in peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(5): 1145-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Nielsen YJ. Whole-body MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Dan Med Bull. 2010; 57(12)[PubMed]
  • 27. Binkert CA, Baker PD, Petersen BD, Szumowski J, Kaufman JA. Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard bolus-chase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography. Radiology. 2004; 232(3): 860-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Pattynama PM, van Sambeek MR, de Haan MW, Stijnen T, et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2005; 236(3): 1094-103[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kitslaar PE, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2005; 235(2): 699-708[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Noaparast M, Rabani A, Karimian F, Bodaghabadi M, Aran S, Mirsharifi R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sixty Four Multi-Slice CT Angiography in Assessment of Arterial Cut-Off and Run-Off in Comparison with Surgical Findings. Iran J Radiol. 2011; 8(2): 89-96[PubMed]
  • 31. Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH, Scanlon TG, Collins JD, Sheehan JJ, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology. 2011; 260(1): 282-93[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Wang J, Yan F, Liu J, Lu J, Li D, Luan J, et al. Multicenter, intra-individual comparison of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of the peripheral arteries (the Peripheral VALUE Study). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 38(4): 926-37[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments