Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Psychometric Properties of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale Among HIV-Infected Iranian Patients

Maryam Mahmoudi 1 , Davoud Shojaezadeh 1 , * , Tahereh Dehdari 2 , Ebrahim Hajizadeh 3 , Mohammad Hossein Taghdisi 2 , 4 , Ladan Abbasian 5 and Mahdiyeh Roohi 6
Authors Information
1 Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, TarbiatModares University, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Research Council Member of Center for Community Based Participatory Research Tehran, IR Iran
5 Iranian Research Center of HIV/ AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High- Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
6 Department of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: March 2, 2015, 17 (2); e25074
  • Published Online: January 25, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 3, 2014
  • Revised: December 5, 2014
  • Accepted: December 31, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.25074

To Cite: Mahmoudi M, Shojaezadeh D, Dehdari T, Hajizadeh E, Hossein Taghdisi M, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale Among HIV-Infected Iranian Patients, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 ; 17(2):e25074. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.25074.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW. Perceiving benefits in adversity: stress-related growth in women living with HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(10): 1543-54[PubMed]
  • 2. Moneyham L, Hennessy M, Sowell R, Demi A, Seals B, Mizuno Y. The effectiveness of coping strategies used by HIV-seropositive women. Res Nurs Health. 1998; 21(4): 351-62[PubMed]
  • 3. Lazarus RS. From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol. 1993; 44: 1-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Rodkjaer L, Chesney MA, Lomborg K, Ostergaard L, Laursen T, Sodemann M. HIV-infected individuals with high coping self-efficacy are less likely to report depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study from Denmark. Int J Infect Dis. 2014; 22: 67-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Chesney MA, Chambers DB, Taylor JM, Johnson LM, Folkman S. Coping effectiveness training for men living with HIV: results from a randomized clinical trial testing a group-based intervention. Psychosom Med. 2003; 65(6): 1038-46[PubMed]
  • 6. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. 1984;
  • 7. Folkman S. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45(8): 1207-21[PubMed]
  • 8. DiClemente CC, Fairhurst SK, Piotrowski NA. Self-Efficacy and Addictive Behaviors. Springer. 1995; : 109-41[DOI]
  • 9. Chesney MA, Neilands TB, Chambers DB, Taylor JM, Folkman S. A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. Br J Health Psychol. 2006; 11: 421-37[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity1. Pers Psychol. 1975; 28(4): 563-75[DOI]
  • 11. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research. 2013;
  • 12. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 2005;
  • 13. Mueller RO. Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. 1996; [DOI]
  • 14. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2011; [DOI]
  • 15. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996; 1(2): 130[DOI]
  • 16. Bollen KA, Long JS. Testing structural equation models. 1993;
  • 17. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling Multidiscip J. 1999; 6(1): 1-55[DOI]
  • 18. Waltz CF, Strickland O, Lenz E. R. . Measurement in nursing and health research. 2010;
  • 19. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. 2006;
  • 20. Tol A, Mohebbi B, Hossaini M, Majlessi F. Developing a Valid and Reliable Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Iranian Version. Open J Endocr Metab Dis. 2014; 4: 45-51
  • 21. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Meas health psychol. 1995; 1: 35-7
  • 22. Barlow JH, Williams B, Wright CC. The reliability and validity of the arthritis self-efficacy scale in a UK context. Psychol Health Med. 1997; 2(1): 3-17[DOI]
  • 23. Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Kirwan J, Barrett J, Stamp J, Haslock I. Development and validation of a self-efficacy scale for use in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RASE). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001; 40(11): 1221-30[PubMed]
  • 24. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003; 27(2): 94-104[DOI]
  • 25. Adaptation of Coping Self-Efficacy Scale in Latvian. 11th European Conference on Psychological Assessment.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments