Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Ambivalence Towards Childbirth in a Medicalized Context: A Qualitative Inquiry Among Iranian Mothers

Sedigheh Sedigh Mobarakabadi 1 , Khadijeh Mirzaei Najmabadi 1 , * and Mahmoud Ghazi Tabatabaie 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
2 Department of Demography and Population Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: March 01, 2015, 17 (3); e24262
  • Published Online: March 20, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 30, 2014
  • Revised: November 18, 2014
  • Accepted: December 9, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.24262

To Cite: Sedigh Mobarakabadi S, Mirzaei Najmabadi K, Ghazi Tabatabaie M. Ambivalence Towards Childbirth in a Medicalized Context: A Qualitative Inquiry Among Iranian Mothers, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 ; 17(3):e24262. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.24262.

Copyright © 2015, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Mrkic S, Johnson T, Rose M. World’s Women 2010: Trends and Statistics. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2010;
  • 2. WHO UNICEF. UNFPA and The World Bank: Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010; 17
  • 3. Wagner M. Fish can't see water: the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 75 Suppl 1-37[PubMed]
  • 4. Conrad P. The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. 2008;
  • 5. Baker M. Childbirth Practices, Medical Intervention & Women’s Autonomy: Safer Childbirth or Bigger Profits? Womens Health Urban Life. 2005; 4(2): 27-43
  • 6. Christiaens W, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries R. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013; 29(1)-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Smeenk AD, ten Have HA. Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery. Med Health Care Philos. 2003; 6(2): 153-65[PubMed]
  • 8. Russo CA, Wier L, Steiner C. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. 2006; [PubMed]
  • 9. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 59(3): 1-19[PubMed]
  • 10. Unicef . Iran, Islamic Republic, Statistic 2013;
  • 11. Khodakarami N, Jannesari S. Mothers' knowledge of women's bill of right in pregnancy. Iran J Med Ethics History Med. 2009; (2): 51-8
  • 12. Bahadori F, Hakimi S, Heidarzade M. The trend of caesarean delivery in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2013; 19-70
  • 13. Ghazi Tabatabaie M, Moudi Z, Vedadhir A. Home birth and barriers to referring women with obstetric complications to hospitals: a mixed-methods study in Zahedan, southeastern Iran. Reprod Health. 2012; 9: 5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. WHO . Health Systems Profile- Islamic Republic of Iran: Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO. 2006;
  • 15. Torkzahrani S. Commentary: childbirth education in iran. J Perinat Educ. 2008; 17(3): 51-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Holloway I. Qualitative Research In Health Care. 2005;
  • 17. Morse JM, Field PA. Nursing Research: The Application of Qualitative Approaches. 1996;
  • 18. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2007;
  • 19. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9): 1277-88[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 2011;
  • 21. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2): 105-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 2013;
  • 23. McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007; 34(1): 65-79[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Awoyinka BS, Ayinde OA, Omigbodun AO. Acceptability of caesarean delivery to antenatal patients in a tertiary health facility in south-west Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 26(3): 208-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth. 2004; 31(2): 117-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Kirkham M. The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 30(3): 732-9[PubMed]
  • 27. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth. 2001; 28(2): 101-10[PubMed]
  • 28. Lazarus ES. What do women want?: Issues of choice, control, and class in pregnancy and childbirth. Med Anthropol Q. 1994; 8(1): 25-46
  • 29. Barker KK. A ship upon a stormy sea: the medicalization of pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47(8): 1067-76[PubMed]
  • 30. Crossley ML. Childbirth, complications and the illusion ofchoice': A case study. Fem Psychol. 2007; 17(4): 543-63
  • 31. Beckett K. Choosing Cesarean Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States. Feminist Theory. 2005; 6(3): 251-75
  • 32. The President’s Office Deputy of Strategic Planning and Control. National population and housing Census 2011. 2011;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments