IF: 0.644
REUTERS THOMSON

Risk Factors for Sensorineural Hearing Loss Among High-Risk Infants in Golestan Province, Iran in 2010 - 2011

AUTHORS

Ehsan Alaee 1 , Mohsen Sirati 2 , Mohammad Hossein Taziki 3 , Mahnaz Fouladinejad 1 , *

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Neonatal and Children’s Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IR Iran

2 School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IR Iran

3 Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IR Iran

How to Cite: Alaee E, Sirati M, Taziki M H, Fouladinejad M. Risk Factors for Sensorineural Hearing Loss Among High-Risk Infants in Golestan Province, Iran in 2010 - 2011, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 ; 17(12):e20419. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.20419.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: 17 (12); e20419
Published Online: December 20, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: July 7, 2014
Revised: October 2, 2014
Accepted: December 3, 2014
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Hearing impairment, as one of the most common birth defects, is a hidden disability with negative impacts on speech and cognitive development.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and determine the associated risk factors among infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and neonatal wards of teaching hospitals, affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 791 infants were recruited via non-random sampling. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were gathered, and the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test was performed upon admission. Afterwards, the subjects were followed-up and re-assessed, using the AABR test. For infants with abnormal AABR results, the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) test was performed on the day of discharge.

Results: The mean age of the infants was 3.75 ± 4.86 days upon admission, and 56.4% of the subjects were female. The mean length of hospital stay was 9.63 ± 1.1 days; the subjects were hospitalized for 3.50 ± 10.21 days in the NICUs and 6.1 ± 5.27 days in the neonatal wards. In total, 3.4% of the infants presented with SNHL. No significant difference was found between SNHL and neonates’ age (P = 0.52), sex (P = 0.5), or sepsis (P = 0.94). However, SNHL was significantly associated with gestational age (P = 0.045), birth weight (P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), pathological jaundice (P=0.033), antibiotic treatments (P = 0.007), and total serum bilirubin level (P = 0.01). Additionally, binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated the association between SNHL and these factors.

Conclusions: In this study, the prevalence of SNHL among hospitalized neonates was similar to previous reports in Iran and other countries. Based on the findings, administration of ototoxic drugs during the neonatal period can lead to SNHL. Therefore, it seems essential to regularly screen newborns under treatment and limit the indiscriminate use of ototoxic drugs.

Keywords

Infant Iran Newborn Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Copyright © 2015, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Hearing impairment is described as reduced ability to apprehend sounds (1). The prevalence of hearing loss, defined as bilateral hearing loss > 60 db, is estimated at 1 case per 1000 individuals. If the threshold for bilateral hearing loss is considered to be more than 40 db, the prevalence of this impairment increases to 3 cases per 1000 individuals (2).

Diagnosis of hearing impairment in infants and neonates is not simply possible through regular clinical examinations. In fact, considering the delayed language development in these neonates, severe hearing loss is not usually diagnosed until 18 to 24 months of life (3-5). Mild or moderate hearing loss is also not recognized until 48 months of infant’s life (6, 7).

The first three years of every individual’s life is deemed to be a critical stage for language development. If an infant is not exposed to language input during this golden period due to hearing impairment, his/her language skills, reading ability, and learning progress will be negatively affected. Hearing loss also leads to cognitive, verbal, emotional, and psychological disabilities in the infants (8-10).

Approximately, 20% - 30% of children with hearing loss show no initial symptoms. As a result, implementation of hearing screening programs is quite essential. Based on some previous studies, more than 50% of children with hearing defects have no known risk factors (11-16). Also, 30% of children with learning disabilities are somehow affected by hearing defects (17).

Today, many organizations have endorsed the nation-wide execution of hearing screening programs at birth and before hospital discharge. Considering the importance of these programs, various states in the United States have passed the required legislations (18, 19). Early diagnosis of hearing loss before the presentation of symptoms or complications is essential for the health of an individual. Moreover, determining the prevalence of a condition is crucial for assessing its negative impacts on society and designing healthcare programs (12).

Early diagnosis of hearing loss in children and timely treatment can improve infants’ health status, their potentials, and cognitive abilities. Moreover, through determining the risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) during the fetal period and at birth, it is possible to eliminate these risk factors and prevent the adverse consequences (14).

2. Objectives

So far, no precise data has been reported regarding the number of neonates with SNHL in Iran. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevalence of SNHL and the associated risk factors in neonatal wards and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of governmental hospitals, affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences. We also attempted to promote hearing loss prevention and diagnosis in neonates.

3. Patients and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 870 neonates, who were eligible for the research, were selected via non-random convenience sampling during the study period. The subjects were selected among hospitalized patients in the neonatal wards and NICUs of Taleghani and Dezyani Educational Centers (with 30 beds in NICUs and 35 beds in neonatal wards) in Gorgan, Iran during 2010 - 2011.

The sample size was calculated at 754 subjects, based on the comparison of main variables (α = 0.05, β = 0.2, P = 0.06, d = 0.1, and N = 1500). Finally, considering a 15% dropout rate, the sample size was calculated to be 870 subjects. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) being affected by at least one of the probable risk factors for SNHL, e.g., low birth weight and asphyxia during the neonatal period; 2) receiving intensive neonatal care for more than 48 hours; 3) pathological jaundice (bilirubin level deviating from the normal range, considering the neonate’s age and weight); and 4) administration of ototoxic drugs such as aminoglycoside and furosemide. Also, patients were included in case the Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) at birth were normal.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) neonate’s death before discharge; 2) abnormal results of automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) at admission; 3) oxoplasmosis, other (syphilis, varicella-zoster, parvovirus B19), Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, and Herpes (TORCH) infections; 4) chromosomal abnormalities; 5) craniofacial anomalies; and 6) absence from the audiometric test at the time of discharge (20-22).

The AABR test was performed for all the neonates upon admission, and a form of neonatal characteristics was completed. The data included neonatal age, gestational age, birth weight, sex, duration of hospitalization, craniofacial anomalies, pathological jaundice, serum bilirubin level, type of used ototoxic drugs (e.g., gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, vancomycin, or furosemide), and duration of ototoxic treatment. Before hospital discharge, all the infants were evaluated using the AABR test. For neonates with abnormal AABR results, the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) test was performed on the day of discharge.

All audiometric tests were performed by a professional audiometrist, blinded to the study procedures. In this study, ABR was in the frequency range of 1000 - 3000 Hz. Clicks of alternating polarity were used (unilateral stimulation) with a frequency of 80 pulses per second and 35, 40, and 45 dB intensities. The waves were generated, based on 3000 trials in 10 milliseconds (ms), using an audioscreener by Grason Stadler Incorporation (Madsen AccuScreen 1077, GN Otometrics, USA).

The present study was approved by the ethics committee of Golestan university of medical sciences. Before starting the study, the objectives were explained to the parents, and informed consents were obtained from the mother or father.

The collected data were presented as measures of central tendency and dispersion and were analyzed using SPSS version 11.5. To determine the statistical differences among the variables, Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables and independent t-test for quantitative variables (considering the normal distribution of data). Normality of the data was assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Also, the odds ratios (ORs) were calculated through logistic regression test. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (95% CI).

4. Results

In this cross-sectional study, 56.4% of the subjects were females, and the mean age of the neonates upon admission was 3.75 ± 4.86 days (age range: 0 - 29 days). Among 870 subjects, 40 cases were excluded due to abnormal AABR results at admission, 20 cases due to death before hospital discharge, 10 cases due to congenial infections and anomalies, and 9 cases due to early discharge and absence from the hearing test (withdrawal rate = 9.08%).

Finally, the data related to 791 neonates was analyzed. In total, 29.3% (n = 232) of the subjects were hospitalized within the first hours after birth. The mean length of hospital stay was 9.63 ± 1.1 days; the subjects were hospitalized for 3.50 ± 10.21 days in the NICUs and 6.1 ± 5.27 days (range: 0 - 48 days) in the neonatal wards. Tables 1 and 2 demonstrate the distribution of clinical interventions, as well as subjects’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Moreover, the results of hearing tests are depicted in Table 3.

Table 1. Distribution of Clinical Interventions and Demographic Characteristics
VariablesRangeValuesa
Age, d0 - 293.75 ± 4.86
Length of hospital stay, d1 - 1109.63 ± 1.1
Serum bilirubin level, mg/dL6 - 3514.12 ± 6.39
Gentamicin use, d0 - 292.73 ± 4.62
Amikacin use, d0 - 283.75 ± 5.71
Tobramycin use, d0 - 150.15 ± 1.44
Vancomycin use, d0 - 221.27 ± 4.11
Furosemide use, d0 - 70.01 ± 0.27

aData are presented as mean ± SD.

Table 2. Distribution of Clinical Interventions and Demographic Characteristics (Categorical Variables)a
VariablesValuesb
Gestational age
Preterm419 (53.0)
Term372 (47.0)
Body weight
SGA258 (32.6)
AGA510 (64.5)
LGA23 (2.9)
Gender
Male345 (43.6)
Female446 (56.4)
Pathological jaundice
Icteric431 (54.5)
Non-icteric360 (45.5)
Sepsis
Clinical sepsisc367 (46.4)
Suspected sepsisd88 (11.2)
Proven sepsise9 (1.1)
No sepsis327 (41.3)
Antibiotic treatment
Use of ototoxic drugs463 (58.8)
No use of ototoxic drugs22 (2.8)
Type of ototoxic antibioticsf
Gentamicin250 (31.6)
Amikacin282 (35.4)
Tobramycin10 (1.3)
Vancomycin76 (9.6)
Furosemide
Received5 (0.6)
Not received786 (99.4)

aAbbreviations: bLGA, Large for gestational age; cAGA, Appropriate for gestational age; SGA, Small for gestational age.

bData are presented as No (%).

cClinical manifestations of sepsis plus negative blood culture and negative C-reactive protein (CRP).

dClinical manifestations of sepsis, positive blood culture (often caused by contamination), and at least two positive blood tests, or CRP > 6 mg/L, or abnormal chest x-ray results, or positive cerebrospinal fluid culture, based on birth records.

eClinical manifestation of sepsis plus positive blood culture and common pathogens of neonatal infections (23, 24).

fSome neonates were administered two antibiotics simultaneously.

Table 3. The Results of Neonates’ Hearing Testsa,b
Auditory TestsDefects in the Left EarDefects in the Right EarDefects in Both EarsHealthy Ears
AABR at hospitalization19 (2.4)11 (1.4)10 (1.3)751 (94.9)
AABR at discharge2 (0.3)3 (0.4)21 (2.7)765 (96.6)
Final ABR2 (0.3)3 (0.4)21 (2.7)765 (96.6)

aAbbreviations: AABR, Automated Auditory Brainstem Response; ABR, Auditory Brainstem Response.

bData are presented as No (%).

The statistical analysis showed no significant association between SNHL and neonates’ age (P = 0.52), sex (P = 0.5), or sepsis (P = 0.94). However, SNHL was significantly associated with gestational age (P = 0.045), birth weight (P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), pathological jaundice (P = 0.033), antibiotic treatments (P = 0.007), and total serum bilirubin level (P = 0.01).

Moreover, a significant association was found between SNHL and use of gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, and vancomycin (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant correlation between SNHL and duration of antibiotic treatments (P < 0.001). However, SNHL was not significantly associated with furosemide administration or duration of furosemide treatment (P = 0.78 and P = 0.76, respectively). Additionally, binary logistic regression analysis was performed in order to control the confounding variables and determine the odds ratios (Table 4).

Table 4. Binary Logistic Regression of Factors Associated With Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
VariablesOR95% CIP-Value
Gestational age, d2.481.03 - 5.970.04
Birth weight, g2.590.71 - 3.91< 0.001
Length of hospital stay, d2.871.97 - 4.11< 0.001
Pathological jaundice2.481.82 - 5.460.001
Total bilirubin level, mg⁄dL3.491.37 - 6.380.001
Use of antibiotics4.971048 - 16.710.009
Gentamicin3.631.62 - 8.120.002
Amikacin4.271.83 - 9.950.001
Tobramycin14.123.43 - 58.12< 0.001
Vancomycin5.522.37 - 12.85< 0.001
Duration of gentamicin treatment3.171.03 - 7.350.001
Duration of amikacin treatment3.021.46 - 6.800.001
Duration of tobramycin treatment4.261.14 - 8.27< 0.001
Duration of vancomycin treatment4.101.42 - 7.83< 0.001

5. Discussion

In the current study, based on the final ABR results, 26 cases (3.4%) had SNHL, while in a study by Bayat in 2007, this type of hearing loss was reported in 7.6% of the subjects (25). Also, in a study by Pourarian in 2012, 13.7% of the participants suffered from hearing loss, which was higher than the expected rate. This discrepancy in the prevalence of SNHL might be related to differences in SNHL assessment methods (26). In addition, in studies by Coenraad in 2010, Ohl in 2009, Taghdiri in 2008, and Zahedpasha in 2007, 3%, 4.55%, 4%, and 1.2% of the newborns were affected by SNHL, respectively (20, 27-29).

The results of this study showed that birth weight, gestational age, length of hospital stay, pathological jaundice, serum bilirubin level, use of ototoxic antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, and vancomycin), and duration of antibiotic treatment are risk factors for the development of adventitious SNHL. The ABR results showed that SNHL was significantly associated with these variables. However, SNHL was not significantly related to neonatal age, gender, sepsis, use of furosemide, or duration of furosemide treatment.

In a study by Ohl, the risk factors for SNHL included severe birth asphyxia, neurological disorders, TORCH infections, family history of hearing loss, and neonatal age at screening; however, hearing loss was not associated with birth weight below 1500 g or birth before 34 weeks of gestation (29). Furthermore, in a study by Taghdiri, poor AABR results were significantly associated with hyperbilirubinemia and birth weight less than 1500 g (28). Also, in a study by Amini, no statistical correlation was found between 5-minute Apgar score and abnormal OAE; however, a significant relationship was found between the mean birth weight and abnormal OAE (30).

In the current study, gestational age was significantly associated with SNHL, and a significant difference was observed between term and preterm newborns. However, findings reported by Porto in 2011 were inconsistent with the present results, and auditory responses in ABR tests were not significantly different between term and preterm infants; this discrepancy might be related to the small sample size of the mentioned study (31). On the other hand, the findings of a study by Casali in 2010 were in agreement with the present results, and there was a significant difference in ABR wave delays between term and preterm newborns; also, an inverse correlation was found between gestational age and these delays (32).

As previously mentioned, administration of ototoxic antibiotics significantly reduced the neonates’ hearing ability. In fact, the longer course of antibiotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of SNHL. Similarly, Bayat introduced aminoglycosides as the cause of hearing loss in neonates (25). Moreover, in the study by Zahedpasha, 7 neonates (1.2%) had abnormal ABR results and only those, who had received furosemide, showed significant differences in terms of SNHL (20). Contrarily, in the present study, furosemide administration and treatment course were not significantly associated with the prevalence of hearing loss, which might be due to the limited number of subjects using this medication.

According to previous studies, the prevalence of pathological jaundice and high bilirubin level were also important risk factors for SNHL during the neonatal period. In a study by Boo in 2008, 32 neonates (8.12%) presented with severe hyperbilirubinemia and unilateral or bilateral SNHL; however, there was no significant difference in peak serum bilirubin level between neonates with hearing loss and healthy subjects (33).

In a study by Ahlfors and Parker in 2008, increased serum unconjugated bilirubin level, unlike total bilirubin, was associated with abnormal AABR responses; this might be due to the closer correlation between unconjugated bilirubin concentration and bilirubin neurotoxicity, compared to total bilirubin level (34). Also, Mojtabaei et al. in 2008 showed that increased level of indirect bilirubin (> 20 mg/dL) causes hearing impairment in neonates and increases the I-V interpeak latency (35). Additionally, in a study by Akbari and Keyhani in 2005 - 2006, 15% of newborns with severe hyperbilirubinemia (> 20 mg/dL) presented with auditory neuropathy (36).

The strengths of the present study included the high participation rate, the longitudinal design, use of one single measurement tool, and performance of evaluations by one audiometrist, which could prevent measurement errors and observer bias. However, since the subjects were selected among hospitalized patients, we cannot generalize the findings to the whole population; this could be one limitation of the present study. Another shortcoming of this study was deviation of some variables from the mean value and therefore, the need for non-parametric tests, which are generally not as reliable as other tests.

In conclusion, administration of ototoxic antibiotics, prolonged hospitalization, and long duration of treatment can increase the prevalence of SNHL in neonates. In addition, neonates with other risk factors such as abnormal birth weight, preterm birth, and pathological jaundice are more susceptible to hearing loss and require more attentive care and long-term follow-ups. Therefore, timely detection and prevention of the mentioned risk factors is highly recommended.

Additionally, proper control of maternal risk factors in pregnancy and timely prevention of abnormalities and fetal distress may play an important role in reducing the prevalence of hearing loss in infants. It seems that neonates receiving ototoxic therapies need to be screened and continuously followed-up to prevent future complications such as cognitive, behavioral, and developmental disorders.

Acknowledgements

Footnote

References

  • 1. Stedman TL. Stedman's medical dictionary for the health professions and nursing. 2005;
  • 2. Berg AL, Prieve BA, Serpanos YC, Wheaton MA. Hearing screening in a well-infant nursery: profile of automated ABR-fail/OAE-pass. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(2) : 269 -75 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Katz J, Gabbay WL, Ungerleider DS, Wilde L. Handbook of clinical audiology. 1978;
  • 4. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(1)[PubMed]
  • 5. O'Neal JFT, Littman T. Neonatal hearing screening: follow-up and diagnosis. 2000; : 527 -44
  • 6. Finckh-Kramer U, Gross M, Bartsch M, Kewitz G, Versmold H, Hess M. [Hearing screening of high risk newborn infants]. HNO. 2000; 48(3) : 215 -20 [PubMed]
  • 7. Rhodes MC, Margolis RH, Hirsch JE, Napp AP. Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: comparison of methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 120(6) : 799 -808 [PubMed]
  • 8. Oysu C, Aslan I, Ulubil A, Baserer N. Incidence of cochlear involvement in hyperbilirubinemic deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002; 111(11) : 1021 -5 [PubMed]
  • 9. Stelmachowicz PG, Gorga MP. Pediatric audiology: Early identification and management of hearing loss.
  • 10. American Academy of Pediatrics JCOIH. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(4) : 898 -921 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. . Universal screening for hearing loss in newborns: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2008; 122(1) : 143 -8 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Yoshinaga-Itano C. Efficacy of Early Identification and Early Intervention. Seminars Hearing. 2008; 16(2) : 115 -22 [DOI]
  • 13. Kaye CI, Committee on G, Accurso F, La Franchi S, Lane PA, Hope N, et al. Newborn screening fact sheets. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(3) -63 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Newborn and infant hearing loss: Detection and intervention. Pediatrics. 1999; 103(2) : 527 -30 [DOI]
  • 15. Davis A, Wood S. The epidemiology of childhood hearing impairment: Factors relevant to planning of services. Br J Audiol. 1992; 26(2) : 77 -90 [DOI]
  • 16. Watkin PM, Baldwin M, McEnery G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child. 1991; 66(10 Spec No) : 1130 -5 [PubMed]
  • 17. Yoshikawa S, Ikeda K, Kudo T, Kobayashi T. The effects of hypoxia, premature birth, infection, ototoxic drugs, circulatory system and congenital disease on neonatal hearing loss. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004; 31(4) : 361 -8 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Hearing screening with ABR and TEOAEs in NICU babies. Proceedings of the European Consensus Development Conference on Neonatal Hearing Screening. : 15 -6
  • 19. Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(6) : 1452 -60 [PubMed]
  • 20. Zahedpasha Y, Ahmadpoor M, Aghajani R. Hearing screening following treatment of neonates in NICU. Iran J Pediatr. 2007; 17 : 14 -20
  • 21. Shehata-Dieler WE, Dieler R, Keim R, Finkenzeller P, Dietl J, Helms J. [Universal hearing screening of newborn infants with the BERA-phone]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2000; 79(2) : 69 -76 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Roberts EC. Audiologists' Desk Reference, Volume 1 Diagnostic Audiology Principles, Procedures, and Practices. Ear Hear. 1998; 19(5) : 414
  • 23. Polin RA, Committee on F. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(5) : 1006 -15 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Afjeh SA, Sabzehei MK, Karimi A, Shiva F, Shamshiri AR. Surveillance of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a neonatal intensive care unit: characteristics, risk factors, and outcome. Arch Iran Med. 2012; 15(9) : 567 -71
  • 25. Bayat A, Dehdashtian M, Kavyani G, Asadi M, Masoumi A. Early identification of hearing impairment of neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit using otoacoustic emissions. Arak Med Univ J. 2007; 10(3) : 17 -24
  • 26. Pourarian S, Khademi B, Pishva N, Jamali A. Prevalence of hearing loss in newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 24(68) : 129 -34 [PubMed]
  • 27. Coenraad S, Hoeve LJ, Goedegebure A. Incidence and clinical value of prolonged I-V interval in NICU infants after failing neonatal hearing screening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 268(4) : 501 -5 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Taghdiri MMEF, Emami F, Abbasi B, Zandvakili H, Cheraghali A. Auditory evaluation of high newborns by automated auditory brain stem response [persian]. Iran J Pediatr. 2008; 18(4) : 330 -4
  • 29. Ohl C, Dornier L, Czajka C, Chobaut JC, Tavernier L. Newborn hearing screening on infants at risk. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73(12) : 1691 -5 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Amini E, Kasheh Farahani Z, Rafiee Samani M, Hamedi H, Zamani A, Karimi Yazdi A, et al. Assessment of Hearing Loss by OAE in Asphyxiated Newborns. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(1)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Porto MA, Azevedo MF, Gil D. Auditory evoked potentials in premature and full-term infants. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 77(5) : 622 -7 [PubMed]
  • 32. Casali RL, Santos MF. Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response: response patterns of full-term and premature infants. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 76(6) : 729 -38 [PubMed]
  • 33. Boo NY, Rohani AJ, Asma A. Detection of sensorineural hearing loss using automated auditory brainstem-evoked response and transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinaemia. Singapore Med J. 2008; 49(3) : 209 -14 [PubMed]
  • 34. Ahlfors CE, Parker AE. Unbound bilirubin concentration is associated with abnormal automated auditory brainstem response for jaundiced newborns. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(5) : 976 -8 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Mojtabaei SH, Jalali MM, Jenabi AH, Saljoughi L. Relation between indirect hyperbilirubinemia and auditory brain response abnormality due to neonatal icter. J Med Faculty Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2008; 16(64) : 106 -11
  • 36. Akbari M, Sadeghijam M, Keyhani MR. Auditory site of lesion in infants suffering from hyperbilirubinemia by using ABR and TEOAEs. Audiology. 2006; 14(2) : 19 -25
  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: