Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Determining of Factors Influencing the Success and Failure of Hospital Information System and Their Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review

Farahnaz Sadoughi 1 , Khalil Kimiafar 1 , 2 , * , Maryam Ahmadi 1 and Mohammad Taghi Shakeri 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Medical records and Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal: December 01, 2013, 15 (12); e11716
  • Published Online: December 5, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 22, 2013
  • Revised: May 3, 2013
  • Accepted: May 10, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.11716

To Cite: Sadoughi F, Kimiafar K, Ahmadi M, Shakeri M T. Determining of Factors Influencing the Success and Failure of Hospital Information System and Their Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review, Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 ; 15(12):e11716. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11716.

Abstract
Copyright © 2013, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Low C, Hsueh Chen Y. Criteria for the evaluation of a cloud-based hospital information system outsourcing provider. J Med Syst. 2012; 36(6): 3543-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Sheikhtaheri A, Sadoughi F, Ahmadi M, Moghaddasi H. A framework of a patient safety information system for Iranian hospitals: lessons learned from Australia, England and the US. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(5): 335-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 75(2): 125-37[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykanen P, Prokosch HU, Rigby M, Talmon J, et al. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform. 2004; 73(6): 479-91[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Rigby M. Evaluation--the Cinderella science of ICT in health. Yearb Med Inform. 2006; : 114-20[PubMed]
  • 6. Sadoughi Farahnaz, Aminpour Farzaneh. A Review on the Evaluation Methods of Health Information Systems. Iran J Med Edu. 2011; 10(5): 1077-1086
  • 7. Ozkan Sevgi, Baykal Nazife, Sincan Murat. Process-Based Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems: Application of an Information System Success Model (PRISE) in the Healthcare Domain. Health Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. 2012; : 339-355
  • 8. Brender J. Human, social, and organizational aspects of health information systems. 2008; : 180-201
  • 9. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001; 64(2-3): 143-56[PubMed]
  • 10. Fortune J, Peters G. Information systems : achieving success by avoiding failure. 2005;
  • 11. Aggelidis VassiliosP, Chatzoglou ProdromosD. Methods for evaluating hospital information systems: a literature review. EuroMed J Busin. 2008; 3(1): 99-118
  • 12. Wateridge John. How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? Int J Project Manag. 1998; 16(1): 59-63
  • 13. Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, Alvarez M, Massip P, Lang T. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? Int J Qual Health Care. 2004; 16(5): 407-16[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. Methods Inf Med. 2004; 43(3): 215-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Rahimi B, Vimarlund V. Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: a literature review. J Med Syst. 2007; 31(5): 397-432[PubMed]
  • 16. Jones Capers. Patterns of large software systems: failure and success. Computer. 1995; 28(3): 86-87
  • 17. Kaplan B, Harris-Salamone KD. Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16(3): 291-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Wears RL, Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA. 2005; 293(10): 1261-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Sadoughi F, Sheikhtaheri A, Meidani Z ShahmoradiL. Management information system (concept, structure, development and evaluation). 2011;
  • 20. Kaplan B. Culture counts: how institutional values affect computer use. MD Comput. 2000; 17(1): 23-6[PubMed]
  • 21. Perera R, Dowell T, Crampton P, Kearns R. Panning for gold: an evidence-based tool for assessment of performance indicators in primary health care. Health Policy. 2007; 80(2): 314-27[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Brender Jytte. Evaluation Methods to Monitor Success and Failure Factors in Health Information System’s Development. Health Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. 2010; : 605-626[DOI]
  • 23. Van Der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10(3): 235-43[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Sadoughi F, Ghazisaeidi M, Meraji M, Kimiafar K, Ramezanghorbani N. Health information management technology. 2011;
  • 25. Ammenwerth E, Graber S, Herrmann G, Burkle T, Konig J. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2003; 71(2-3): 125-35[PubMed]
  • 26. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform. 2001; 64(1): 39-56[PubMed]
  • 27. Kaplan B, Shaw NT. People, organizational, and social issues: Evaluation as an exemplar. Yearbook Med Info. 2002; 2
  • 28. Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykanen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems--a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med. 2006; 45(1): 125-36[PubMed]
  • 29. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine (Health Informatics). 2006;
  • 30. Moradi Gholamreza, Sarbaz Masoumeh, Kimiafar Khalil, Shafiei Naser, Setayesh Yousof. The role of hospital information system on Dr Sheikh Hospital performance promotion in Mashhad. Health Info Manag J. 2009; 5(2)
  • 31. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(4): 299-308[PubMed]
  • 32. Vafaee A, Vahedian M, Esmaeily H, Kimiafar K. Views of Users towards the Quality of Hospital Information System in Training Hospitals. J Res Health Sci. 2010; 10(1): 47-53[PubMed]
  • 33. Ahmadi M, Barabadi M, Kamkar Haghighi M. Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems in the Medical Records. Health Info Manag J. 2010; 7(1): 48-55
  • 34. Farzandipour Mehrdad, Sadoughi Farahnaz, Meidani Zahra. Hospital Information Systems User Needs Analysis: A Vendor Survey. J Health Informat Dev Countries. 2011; 5(1)
  • 35. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8: 45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 36. Beck CT. Caring within nursing education: a metasynthesis. J Nurs Educ. 2001; 40(3): 101-9[PubMed]
  • 37. Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M. Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res. 2004; 14(10): 1342-65[DOI][PubMed]
  • 38. Pare G, Sicotte C, Jaana M, Girouard D. Prioritizing the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects. A Delphi study in Canada. Methods Inf Med. 2008; 47(3): 251-9[PubMed]
  • 39. Yu P. A multi-method approach to evaluate health information systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 160: 1231-5[PubMed]
  • 40. Zikos D, Mitsios A, Mantas J. Assessment of hospital information systems implementation: a case study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 165: 123-8[PubMed]
  • 41. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77(6): 386-98[DOI][PubMed]
  • 42. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Hospital information systems: measuring end user computing satisfaction (EUCS). J Biomed Inform. 2012; 45(3): 566-79[DOI][PubMed]
  • 43. Hanmer LA, Roode JD, Isaacs S. Modelling the effect of limited or vulnerable resources on the use of computerised hospital information systems (CHISs) in South Africa. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 130: 299-309[PubMed]
  • 44. Peute LW, Aarts J, Bakker PJ, Jaspers MW. Anatomy of a failure: a sociotechnical evaluation of a laboratory physician order entry system implementation. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79(4)-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 45. Nahm ES, Vaydia V, Ho D, Scharf B, Seagull J. Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide. Nurs Outlook. 2007; 55(6): 282-288[DOI][PubMed]
  • 46. Freed DH. Certain death: ten predictors of hospital information system failure. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2006; 25(1): 26-33[PubMed]
  • 47. Brender Jytte. Handout: Medinfo 2004 Workshop:“Good Evaluation of Health informatics Applications”. 2004;
  • 48. DeLone WilliamH, McLean EphraimR. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Sys Res. 1992; 3(1): 60-95
  • 49. Delone WilliamH. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Sys. 2003; 19(4): 9-30
  • 50. Moghaddasi H, Sheikhtaheri A. CEO is a vision of the future role and position of CIO in healthcare organizations. J Med Syst. 2010; 34(6): 1121-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 51. Shahmoradi L, Ahmadi M, Haghani H. Determining the most important evaluation indicators of healthcare information systems and suggested model. J Health Admin. 2007; 10(28): 15-24
  • 52. Galletta DennisF, Lederer AlbertL. Some cautions on the measurement of user information satisfaction*. Decision Sciences. 1989; 20(3): 419-434
  • 53. Melone NancyPaule. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Manag Scie. 1990; 36(1): 76-91
  • 54. Ahmadi M, Shahmoradi L, Barabadi M, Hoseini AF. A survey of usability of hospital information systems from the perspective of nurses, department secretaries, and paraclinic users in selected hospitals: 2009. J Health Admin. 2011; 14(44)
  • 55. Sadoughi Farahnaz, Khoshkam Masoumeh, Farahi SayedehRaziyeh. Usability Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems in Hospitals Affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Director General. 2012; 9(3)
  • 56. van der Loo RP, van Gennip EM, Bakker AR, Hasman A, Rutten FF. Evaluation of automated information systems in health care: an approach to classifying evaluative studies. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995; 48(1-2): 45-52[PubMed]
  • 57. Brender J. Evaluation of health information applications--challenges ahead of us. Methods Inf Med. 2006; 45(1): 62-6[PubMed]
  • 58. Ammenwerth Elske, Gräber Stefan, Bürkle Thomas, Iller Carola. Evaluation of Health Information Systems: Challenges and Approaches. Medical Informatics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; : 330-345[DOI]
  • 59. Kaplan Bonnie, Duchon Dennis. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Quarterly. 1988; : 571-586
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments