Document Type : Review articles
Authors
1 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Baghiyyatollah al-Azam Hospital, Baqiyatallah University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 1. Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 2. Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Recent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Faculty of Nursing, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Background: A large number of natural disasters, including floods and earthquakes, occur in Iran annually. Recognition of the factors influencing the civil-military coordination in natural disasters is amongst the prerequisites in disaster management. Experts perspectives towards coordination in these disasters can also be indicative of the importance of this subject. Given the fact that no studies have been carried out regarding the relationship between the civil and military forces in the aftermath of natural disasters in Iran, these factors can be recognized according to individuals and experts viewpoints.
Objectives: The present study aimed at extracting the factors influencing the civil-military coordination in the course of natural disasters in Iran through interviewing experts in 2019.
Methods: The present qualitative research was conducted through semi-structured and in-depth interviews with 20 key informants who were selected via snowball, convenience, and purposive sampling methods. A session was also held with the presence of the panel of experts. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis in order to extract the factors influencing the civil-military coordination in natural disasters in Iran.
Results: The factors influencing the coordination between the military and civil organizations were categorized into personnel, stuff, and system issues (structure). In addition, 33 subcategories were also identified. The specialists emphasized that holding instructional courses and regular and periodic exercises could enhance coordination in response to disasters.
Conclusions: The present study showed that coordination between civil and military organizations in the management of natural disasters in Iran is faced with many challenges that should be overcome and reduced through providing organizational, political, and structural supports. Recognition of the factors influencing coordination can be effective in line with the correct management of natural disasters. Furthermore, organizations can be made readier for taking better measures in disasters according to the extracted factors. In order to provide a proper response to natural disasters, all coordination components should be elevated simultaneously and coherently.
Keywords
- McMaster R, Baber C, Houghton R. Analysis of multiagency intent: An example from the emergency services. Hum Factors. 2007.
- Rodríguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, Andersson WA, Kennedy PA, Ressler E. Handbook of disaster research. Springer; 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4.
- De Coning C. Civil-military coordination and UN peacebuilding operations. Afr J Conflict Resolut. 2007;5(2). doi: 10.4314/ajcr.v5i2.39393.
- Comfort LK, Dunn M, Johnson D, Skertich R, Zagorecki A. Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response. Int J Emerg Manage. 2004;2(1/2):62-80. doi: 10.1504/ijem.2004.005314.
- Bennett J, Bertrand W, Harkin C, Wickramatillake H, Samarasinghe S. Coordination of international humanitarian assistance in Tsunami-affected countries. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC); 2006.
- Chua AY, Kaynak S, Foo SS. An analysis of the delayed response to Hurricane Katrina through the lens of knowledge management. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;58(3):391-403. doi: 10.1002/asi.20521.
- Telford J, Cosgrave J. The international humanitarian system and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunamis. Disasters. 2007;31(1):1-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.00337.x. [PubMed: 17367371].
- Chen R, Sharman R, Rao H, Upadhyaya SJ. Coordination in emergency response management. Commun ACM. 2008;51(5):66-73. doi: 10.1145/1342327.1342340.
- McEntire DA. Issues in disaster relief: Progress, perpetual problems and prospective solutions. Disaster Prev Manage Int J. 1999;8(5):351-61. doi: 10.1108/09653569910298279.
- Banipal K. Strategic approach to disaster management: Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Prev Manage Int J. 2006;15(3):484-94. doi: 10.1108/09653560610669945.
- Hall RA, Cular A. Civil-military relations in disaster rescue and relief activities: Response to the mudslide in southern Leyte, Philippines. Sci Mil South Afr J Mil Stud. 2011;38(2). doi: 10.5787/38-2-90.
- Tatham P. Improving the civil-military dimension of disaster-related humanitarian logistics. Asia Pacific Civil-Military Centre of Excellence; 2011.
- Nugroho SP, Pandanwangi TS, Suprapto S. Civil-military cooperation in disaster management. J Pertahanan. 2016;2(2):129-44.
- Heaslip G, Sharif AM, Althonayan A. Employing a systems-based perspective to the identification of inter-relationships within humanitarian logistics. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;139(2):377-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.022.
- Cullen A. The Oasis approach to civil/military information sharing for disaster and emergency management, C3I for crisis, emergency and consequence management symposium. IST-086/RSY-019, May 2009, Bucharest; 2009.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions Eval. 2007;2007(114):11-25. doi: 10.1002/ev.223.
- Burke R. Lessons from Katrina: Commanding the military during disaster response - then and now. Int J Emerg Manage. 2016;12(3):221. doi: 10.1504/ijem.2016.079016.
- Thompson WC. Success in Kashmir: A positive trend in civil-military integration during humanitarian assistance operations. Disasters. 2010;34(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01111.x. [PubMed: 19459902].
- Nieves WJ. Review of civil-military coordination in local disaster response. Dayton, Ohio: Wright State University; 2012.
- Berggren P, NäHlinder S, Svensson E. Characteristics of command and control in response to emergencies and disasters. Assessing command and control effectiveness. CRC Press; 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315568119.
- Rietjens SJ, Verlaan K, Zaalberg TW, de Boer SJ. Inter-organisational communication in civil-military cooperation during complex emergencies: A case study in Afghanistan. Disasters. 2009;33(3):412-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01081.x. [PubMed: 19178549].
- McMaster R, Baber C. Multi-agency operations: Cooperation during flooding. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.006. [PubMed: 21570058].
- Salmon P, Stanton N, Jenkins D, Walker G. Coordination during multi‐agency emergency response: Issues and solutions. Disaster Prev Manage Int J. 2011;20(2):140-58. doi: 10.1108/09653561111126085.
- Pramanik R. Challenges in coordination: Differences in perception of civil and military organizations by comparing international scientific literature and field experiences. J Risk Res. 2015;18(7):989-1007. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1043566.
- Scotter JR, Pawlowski SD, Cu TD. An examination of interdependencies among major barriers to coordination in disaster response. Int J Emerg Manage. 2012;8(4):281. doi: 10.1504/ijem.2012.051640.
- Czerwinski SJ. Disaster recovery: Experiences from past disasters offer insights for effective collaboration after catastrophic events. DIANE Publishing; 2010.
- Bollettino V. Civil-military engagement: An empirical account of humanitarian perceptions of civil-military coordination during the response to Typhoon Haiyan. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):7-10. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.85. [PubMed: 26160337].
- Malesic M. The impact of military engagement in disaster management on civil–military relations. Curr Sociol. 2015;63(7):980-98. doi: 10.1177/0011392115577839.
- Joyce N. Civilian-military coordination in the emergency response in Indonesia. Mil Med. 2006;171(10 Suppl 1):66-70. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.1s.66. [PubMed: 17447628].
- Morris JC, Morris ED, Jones DM. Reaching for the philosopher’s stone: Contingent coordination and the military’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Public Admin Rev. 2007;67:94-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00818.x.
- Nabi PG. Coordinating post-disaster humanitarian response: lessons from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, India. Dev Prac. 2014;24(8):975-88. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2014.964187.
', './data/ircmj/coversheet/cover_en.jpg'))