This Article

Citations


Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Comparison of Topical Nifedipine With Oral Nifedipine for Treatment of Anal Fissure: A Randomized Controlled Trial


1 Department of Surgery, Mostafa Khomeini Hospital, Shahed University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
*Corresponding Author: Parisa Golfam, Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran. Tel: +98-9181310864, Fax: +98-8317246693, E-mail: pgolfam@kums.ac.ir.
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2014 August; 16(8): e13592 , DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.13592 | PMID: 25389477 | PMCID: PMC4222003
Article Type: Research Article; Received: Jul 18, 2013; Revised: Mar 4, 2014; Accepted: Apr 6, 2014; epub: Aug 5, 2014; ppub: Aug 5, 2014

Abstract


Background: Medical sphincterotomy has gained popularity as a treatment for anal fissure. Calcium channel blockers in topical forms could also be appropriate with low adverse effects.

Objectives: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare topical and oral nifedipine in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Patients and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at two centers of Shahed University. One hundred and thirty patients with chronic anal fissure aged 18 to 60 years managed in our clinics were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Sixty-five patients received topical nifedipine (TN) and the same number received oral nifedipine (ON).

Results: Ulcer healing occurred in 43 (73.33%) of topical nifedipine group compared to 29 (49.5%) patients in oral nifedipine, which was significantly different (P < 0.05). Side effects such as headache and flushing in oral nifedipine group were more prevalent than topical nifedipine, which was statistically different. Recurrence rates were the same after six months of follow-up.

Conclusions: Although oral nifedipine can reduce symptom and signs of anal fissure, topical nifedipine has a superior role for anal fissure treatment with higher healing rate and lower side effects.

Keywords: Fissure in Ano; Nifedipine; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic

1. Background


Anal fissure is one of the most common diseases in general surgery or proctology clinics. It is a longitudinal tear or split in anoderm just distal to the dentate line often associated with tearing pain with or without rectal bleeding during and after defecation. A minority complain of swelling, pruritus and discharge. Lesions are often in the posterior midline. Skin tags or piles may remain indicating chronic inflammatory changes. The Pathogenesis of anal fissure is uncertain but an accepted theory argues that elevated resting sphincter pressure or muscle spasm leads to relative ischemia especially in posterior midline ulceration, which results in persistence of internal sphincter hypertonia followed by hard stool and higher anal pressure even at rest (1, 2). Most acute anal fissures would heal spontaneously or with conservative therapy. Nonhealing lesions need further medical or surgical treatment. Although with lateral internal sphincterotomy symptomatic improvement and healing are superior to medical therapy, postoperative incontinence rates are noticeable incidence and durability (3). Therefore, alternative modalities need to be sought. "Chemical sphincterotomy" with various compounds has been suggested (4). This alternative option is potentially cost-effective for the management of chronic anal fissure (5). One of the earliest methods of nonsurgical management was botulinum neurotoxin injection (6). Topical medications proposed in the treatment of anal fissure include NO donor ointments such as Isosorbide dinitrate, glyceryl trinitrate, calcium channel blockers, bethanechol, indoramin and potassium channel opener minoxidil. Most previous researches concerned the efficacy of topical agents in anal fissure management. Efficacy of topical diltiazem and nifedipine were offered in our previous studies for the treatment of chronic anal fissure (7, 8). Usage of oral nifedipine was suggested in some studies as a systemic agent effective in anal fissure therapy (8), but no trial was found comparing the two forms of nifedipine. Therefore, this trial was conducted to compare topical nifedipine with oral nifedipine in chronic anal fissure healing, complications and recurrence rate after six months.

2. Objectives


This study designed to compare topical and oral nifedipine in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted.

3. Patients and Methods


A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at two centers of Shahed University in Tehran. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our centers and performed in accordance with the principle of the Helsinki declaration and then registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial (IRCT201104166200n1). Study method was explained to all patients and they were informed regarding the efficacy and adverse effects of the two forms of drug. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. In total, 130 patients with chronic anal fissure aged 18 to 60 years managed in our clinics between February 2002 and February 2007 were included in the study. Chronic fissure was defined as midline posterior or anterior fibrotic ulcer with hypertrophic anal papilla and sentinel pile. None of the patients had a history of sexually transmitted disease, TB, IBD, or medically related conditions such as migraine, cardiovascular and other chronic diseases, anorectal surgery or another anorectal disease. Pregnant patients were also excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Sixty-five patients received topical nifedipine (TN) and the same number received oral nifedipine (ON). In the first group, patients were asked to apply 1 of nifedipine cream (0.5%) to the anal margin and patients in the second group took 10 mg anal nifedipine in three divided doses for four weeks. All patients were advised to increase their intake of fibers and usage of sitz bath for 10-15 minutes, 2-3 times daily. Eight patients (two patients of TN group and six patients of ON group) who had continuous severe symptoms after two weeks were excluded from the study. Three patients of TN did not continue their medical management. Therefore, the ultimate number of patients included in the study reduced to 119 (60 patients in TN and 59 patients in ON group). A visual analogue scale was devised between 0 and 10. Patients were asked to give 0 point to no pain and 10 for the worst pain they ever experienced. On the first visit and regular follow-up visits (1w, 2w, 4w), the position of fissure, pain score, BP, PR, headache and other complications were recorded. Complete healing was defined with complete epithelialization of ulcer bed at visual assessment and no pain. After complete healing, the patients were followed at 2, and 6 months or earlier if symptoms had relapsed. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS for windows ver.10. We checked normal distribution of variables. Students T-test was used for quantitative data and chi-square and U-Mann-Whitney for qualitative data. Quantitative data were presented as mean, standard deviation and range. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results


The TN group included 60 patients, 36 female (60%) and 24 male (40%). Their mean age was 33.71 ranging from 18 to 60 years. The ON group included 59 patients, 32 female (54.23%) and 27 male (45.77%). Their mean age was 32.61 from 20 to 55 years. No significant difference was detected between gender and age distributions of patients as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.
Comparison of Gender and Age a,b

The fissures position were posterior in 84 (70.54%) patients, anterior in 17 (14.28%) patients and both anterior and posterior in 18 (15.12%) patients. In both groups, pain score ranged from 5 to 8 in visual analogue scoring (mean VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) was 5.8 in TN group and 5.07 in ON group).

Table 2.
Position of Anal Fissure and Mean VAS Score a

Preintervention VAS scores in the two groups were comparable (P = 0.08). In TN group, after four weeks treatment, the fissure healed in 42 (70%) patients assessed with examination and patients reported no pain or other symptoms. Reduction of pain (mean VAS: from 5.8 to 2.1) in 15 patients was observed. Three patients who reported no pain had not complete healing in examination. Two patients with persistent ulcer after two weeks additional course of TN (in the same 6w treatment) were healed. In ON group 30 (50.84%) patients had 0 score in VAS after four weeks of treatment and in examination 24 patients (49.15%) were healed. Additional course (2w) for one patient in ON group who had no pain with permanent ulcer had no effect on ulcer healing. Therefore, ultimate ulcer healing after six weeks in the two groups were 43 (73.33%) patients in TN and 29 (49.15%) patients in ON group, which was significantly different (P = 0.033). In TN group there were no significant adverse effects, there were only mild headache in four patients (6.6%) who were treated with acetaminophen. BP parameters had not significant change in the two groups at every follow-up visit (P = 0.09). There were only one episode of orthostatic hypotension in ON group and mild headache in five patients of this group. No change in PR was noted. A significant number of ON group (25 patients) experienced flushing. Four of healed patients in ON group had recurrence within the first two months of follow-up. Therefore, the recurrence rates were the same in the two groups. In six months follow-up, recurrence in TN and ON groups were four (6.6%) and three (5.8%) patients, respectively.

5. Discussion


The current evidence shows that anal fissure is due to anal sphincter hypertonicity and secondary local ischemia, especially in posterior commissure (9, 10). Some studies demonstrated low perfusion in posterior commissure as common site of anal ulcer with post mortem angiographies (11) and Doppler laser flowmetry investigation (12). On the other hand, within pressure accompanied by rise in blood supply and fissure treatment is noted after medical or surgical sphincterotomy (13-15). As we know cytoplasmic calcium is important for smooth muscle contraction and after Coccia et al. used nifedipine in the treatment of achalasia (15), Calcium channel blockers were evaluated for anal fissure treatment. Indeed some researches recommended that chronic anal fissure could be treated with Ca-channel blockers (Level evidence: class I, Grade of recommendation: A) (16).

Antropoli et al. reported reduction in maximum resting pressure in most patients who received 0.2% nifedipine ointment (17). Perrotti et al. in a randomized double blind study reported similar effect for topical nifedipine (18). For assessment of oral nifedipine effect on chronic anal fissure, three manometric studies were conducted reporting reduction in maximum resting pressure in patients who received oral nifedipine (19-21). In our study, topical nifedipine had a clinically and statistically significant success rate for pain relief and ulcer healing at six weeks compared to oral nifedipine. Topical nifedipine caused minimal side effects as compared to oral nifedipine. Considering the limited number of sample group, we concluded that oral nifedipine caused side effects such as flushing and headache, while topically treated group showed minimal side effects. It seems that topical nifedipine brings about lower side effects and is a more effective treatment compared to its oral form.

Footnotes

Authors’ Contributions: Farzane Golfam study concept and design and participated in manuscript preparation. Parisa Golfam prepared manuscript and helped study design and submission of manuscript. Babak Golfam performed analysis and Puyan Pahlavani collected data and helped in manuscript revision.

References


  • 1. Utzig MJ, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ. Concepts in pathogenesis and treatment of chronic anal fissure--a review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(5):968-74. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2. Jonas M, Scholefield JH. Anal fissure. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2001;30(1):167-81.
  • 3. Rotholtz NA, Bun M, Mauri MV, Bosio R, Peczan CE, Mezzadri NA. Long-term assessment of fecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2005;9(2):115-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4. Nelson R. Non surgical therapy for anal fissure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;18(4) [DOI]
  • 5. Christie A, Guest JF. Modelling the economic impact of managing a chronic anal fissure with a proprietary formulation of nitroglycerin (Rectogesic) compared to lateral internal sphincterotomy in the United Kingdom. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17(4):259-67. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, Brisinda D, Maria G. Treating chronic anal fissure with botulinum neurotoxin. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;1(2):82-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7. Golfam F, Golfam P, Khalaj AR, Sayed Mortaz SS. Comparison effect of topical diltiazem with topical nitroglycerin in chronic anal fissure treatment. Daneshvar. 200;71:61-4.
  • 8. Golfam F, Golfam P, Khalaj A, Sayed Mortaz SS. The effect of topical nifedipine in treatment of chronic anal fissure. Acta Med Iran. 2010;48(5):295-9. [PubMed]
  • 9. Collins EE, Lund JN. A review of chronic anal fissure management. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11(3):209-23. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10. Klosterhalfen B, Vogel P, Rixen H, Mittermayer C. Topography of the inferior rectal artery: a possible cause of chronic, primary anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32(1):43-52. [PubMed]
  • 11. McCallion K, Gardiner KR. Progress in the understanding and treatment of chronic anal fissure. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(914):753-8. [PubMed]
  • 12. Cerdan FJ, Ruiz de Leon A, Azpiroz F, Martin J, Balibrea JL. Anal sphincteric pressure in fissure-in-ano before and after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25(3):198-201. [PubMed]
  • 13. Garcea G, Sutton C, Mansoori S, Lloyd T, Thomas M. Results following conservative lateral sphincteromy for the treatment of chronic anal fissures. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(4):311-4. [DOI]
  • 14. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ, De Graaf EJ. Ischaemic nature of anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1996;83(1):63-5. [PubMed]
  • 15. Coccia G, Bortolotti M, Michetti P, Dodero M. Prospective clinical and manometric study comparing pneumatic dilatation and sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia. Gut. 1991;32(6):604-6. [PubMed]
  • 16. Orsay C, Rakinic J, Perry WB, Hyman N, Buie D, Cataldo P, et al. Practice parameters for the management of anal fissures (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(12):2003-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17. Antropoli C, Perrotti P, Rubino M, Martino A, De Stefano G, Migliore G, et al. Nifedipine for local use in conservative treatment of anal fissures: preliminary results of a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(8):1011-5. [PubMed]
  • 18. Perrotti P, Bove A, Antropoli C, Molino D, Antropoli M, Balzano A, et al. Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment vs. active control for treatment of chronic anal fissure: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(11):1468-75. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19. Sileri P, Mele A, Stolfi VM, Grande M, Sica G, Gentileschi P, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(11):1541-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20. Cook TA, Humphreys MM, Mc CMNJ. Oral nifedipine reduces resting anal pressure and heals chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1999;86(10):1269-73. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21. Yucel T, Gonullu D, Oncu M, Koksoy FN, Ozkan SG, Aycan O. Comparison of controlled-intermittent anal dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Surg. 2009;7(3):228-31. [DOI] [PubMed]

Table 1.

Comparison of Gender and Age a,b

GroupsFemaleMaleMean Age
TN36 (60)24 (40)33.71 ± 6.31
ON32 (54.23)27 (45.77)32.61 ± 6.03
a Abbreviations; TN, topical nifedipine; ON, oral nifedipine
b Data are presented as Mean ± SD or No. (%).

Table 2.

Position of Anal Fissure and Mean VAS Score a

GroupsAnteriorPosteriorAnterior and PosteriorMean VAS
TN104285.8
ON742105.24
Total, No. (%)17 (14.58)84 (70.59)18 (15.12)
a Abbreviations: TN; topical nifedipine, ON; oral nifedipine, VAS; visual analogue scale.